{"id":8306,"date":"2011-01-26T13:35:20","date_gmt":"2011-01-26T22:05:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/?p=8306"},"modified":"2011-01-26T13:35:20","modified_gmt":"2011-01-26T22:05:20","slug":"more-on-military-expansion-on-pohakuloa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/?p=8306","title":{"rendered":"More on military expansion on Pohakuloa"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The full extent of military expansion at Pohakuloa is only becoming more evident.<\/p>\n<p>The Army website for the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.garrison.hawaii.army.mil\/PTAPEIS\/default.htm\">Pohakuloa Training Areas Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement can be accessed here<\/a>. Written comments on the proposed action  and alternatives will be accepted via e-mail (<a href=\"mailto:ptapeis@bah.com\">ptapeis@bah.com<\/a>)  and U.S. mail until  <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>February 7, 2011<\/strong><\/span> to:\u00a0 PTA PEIS, P.O. Box 514,  Honolulu, HI  96809. Materials from the scoping  meetings will be made  available on the \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.garrison.hawaii.army.mil\/PTAPEIS\/documents.htm\">Project Documents<\/a>\u201d page.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday, I learned that people witnessed construction activity up on the slopes of Mauna Loa.\u00a0 The activity was so high on the mountain that the observer thought it surely must be outside the boundary of the Pohakuloa Training Area.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Later, they saw explosions near the site from aircraft and land based artillery fire.<\/p>\n<p>We have confirmed that the construction companies were building &#8216;targets&#8217;.\u00a0 Julie Taomia, an archaeologist at Pohakuloa said that the activity is most likely related to Marine Corps projects. She said that the Pohakuloa Training Area extends pretty far up Mauna Loa, beyond the old Hilo-Kona Road.\u00a0\u00a0 She said that the Marines did an Environmental Assessment (EA) for this range construction work. However, since this was done as an EA, as opposed to a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), it slipped past the notice of most people.\u00a0 Furthermore, since this is a Marine Corps project, she said that cultural monitors, which are required under the Army Stryker Brigade programmatic agreement, are not required to oversee ground disturbing activity, which is just a way for the Army to avoid responsibility for the impacts on an Army range.\u00a0 This loophole must be closed. \u00a0 The Marine Corps expansion contributes tot he cumulative impacts of military activity.\u00a0 There should be way to conduct cultural and environmental monitoring\u00a0 for all activity related to the installation regardless of which service branch is doing the project.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to this current Marine Corps expansion activity, the Marines are  expanding training in Pohakuloa to accommodate the new  aircraft  scheduled to be stationed at Mokapu (a.k.a. the Marine Corps  Base  Kane&#8217;ohe).\u00a0 I missed the following article in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bigislandweekly.com\/articles\/2010\/09\/01\/read\/news\/news02.txt\">Big Island Weekly<\/a> when it came out in September.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&gt;&gt;&lt;&lt;<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.bigislandweekly.com\/articles\/2010\/09\/01\/read\/news\/news02.txt<\/p>\n<h2>The Marines are landing on the island<\/h2>\n<div><strong>New squadrons may be using Pohakuloa for future training and gunnery exercises<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>By Alan D. Mcnarie<\/div>\n<div>Wednesday, September 1, 2010 9:50 AM HST<\/div>\n<p>The United States military is planning yet  another expansion entailing increased use of Pohakuloa Training Area.  The Marine Corps wants to move up to three additional squadrons of  aircraft to the islands, including 9 UH-1Y Huey and 18 AH-1Z Cobra  helicopters and 24 of its controversial MV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor  aircraft.<\/p>\n<p>The Marines held &#8220;scoping meetings&#8221; for an  Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed expansion last week in  Hilo and Kona. The meetings followed an &#8220;open house&#8221; format: instead of  allowing public testimony before an open mic, the meeting&#8217;s organizers  set up various visual displays manned by experts to answer questions,  and allowed members of the public to present written testimony or  dictate their input to a court reporter. But a group of protestors led  by Malu Aina&#8217;s Jim Albertini brought their own microphone system to the  Hilo meeting to voice their objections to the plan, including concerns  that increased use of PTA&#8217;s firing range could stir up depleted uranium  dust there and that the Ospreys, which have a less-than-perfect safety  record, could present dangers to servicemen and to the community.<\/p>\n<p>The move would essentially allow an  entire Marine Air-Ground Task Force to operate out of Kaneohe Marine Air  Base. Most of the components of such a task force, including command  and ground elements and CH-53D &#8220;Sea Stallion&#8221; heavy-lift helicopters,  are already in place here. The proposed move would allow medium-lift and  assault helicopters needed by the MAGTF to train alongside the other  elements of the force.<\/p>\n<p>Although the new aircraft would be based  on O&#8217;ahu, their presence would be felt across the island chain. The plan  calls for training, including gunnery exercises, at Pohakuloa; for  refueling facilities and night exercises at Molokai Training Support  Facility and Kalaupapa Airfield, respectively; for additional activities  at the Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, and possibly for target  practice on an islet called Kau&#8217;ula Rock, near Ni&#8217;ihau.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps  the plan&#8217;s most controversial element is the Osprey, a hybrid aircraft  with stubby wings that end in two giant propellers that can lift the  craft like a helicopter, then rotate to pull the machine forward like an  airplane. The Marines want Ospreys to replace their aging C-46 &#8220;Sea  Knight&#8221; medium-lift choppers, which have only about half the Ospreys&#8217;  range and speed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s much more capable (than the C-46) and it&#8217;s  faster &#8211; and faster, for the Marines, is safer,&#8221; said a Marine  spokesperson at the scoping meeting.<\/p>\n<p>But the Osprey has a  troubled history. Based on an experimental craft that gained Bell  Helicopter and Boeing a joint government contract in 1983, first flown  in 1989, Ospreys remained in development for the next 15 years; along  the way, it compiled a long record of cost overruns, mechanical failures  and crashes, killing 30 people before the first operational Marine  squadron began training in 2005.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The mishaps that we had in the  90s and in 2000 [when two Ospreys crashed, killing 23 people] were  tragic,&#8221; said Jason Holder, one of the Marines&#8217; authorities at the  scoping meeting in Hilo. But he said that since those incidents, the  Marines had brought in &#8220;outside experts&#8221; to fix the problems that no  crashes had occurred in over 80,000 flight hours since 2002.<\/p>\n<p>That  statement wasn&#8217;t entirely accurate. An Osprey went down under combat  conditions in Afghanistan in April of 2010. But that accident occurred  during a dust storm and may have been influenced by weather, pilot error  or even enemy action. Due to an electronic malfunction, another Osprey  took off without a pilot and made a rather unsuccessful landing.<\/p>\n<p>The  Ospreys have had enough other problems that the U.S. General Accounting  Office recommended last year the Secretary of Defense require a new  analysis of alternatives to the aircraft, and that the Marines develop  &#8220;a prioritized strategy to improve system suitability, reduce  operational costs, and align future budget requests.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Although  recently deployed in Iraq and regarded favorably, it has not performed  the full range of missions anticipated, and how well it can do so is in  question,&#8221; the GAO Web site (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.gao.gov\/products\/GAO-09-692T\">http:\/\/www.gao.gov\/products\/GAO-09-692T<\/a>) summarized.<\/p>\n<p>At  the Hilo meeting, the Sierra Club&#8217;s Cory Harden provided a long list of  media references about various problems with the Ospreys, including the  aircraft&#8217;s inability to glide to an unpowered landing, as helicopters  can, and a downwash from its rotors that can be so powerful that during a  demonstration at Staten Island, New York, it knocked down tree branches  and injured 10 spectators.<\/p>\n<p>In light of such problems, Harden  asked that the EIS &#8220;evaluate the risks of Ospreys harming military  personnel and civilians&#8221; in Hawai&#8217;i.<\/p>\n<p>Another major concern voiced  at the meeting was the continued presence of depleted uranium at  Pohakuloa and the risk that increased use of the facility&#8217;s target range  might have of stirring up radioactive dust. The military has maintained  that the number of DU shells fired there, and the risk of the dust  leaving the area, were both minimal, while critics claim that thousands  of uranium spotter rounds may have been fired, that the dust could  spread for miles, and that even a few molecules in the lungs could cause  cancer. Albertini pointed out that a County Council resolution had  called for a moratorium on any live fire exercises at PTA until an  independent assessment and cleanup of the DU there had taken place.<\/p>\n<p>The  deployment of the new Marine Aircraft would almost certainly mean more  use of PTA&#8217;s firing range. The Osprey&#8217;s notorious downwash could  certainly stir up dust. But while it can mount an optional belly or ramp  gun, it is primarily a transport, not a gun platform. A much bigger  user of the firing range would likely be the Marines&#8217; venerable Cobras,  which have been blasting enemy targets with gunfire and Hellfire  missiles since the Vietnam era. Jim Isaacs, another Marine expert  running one of the information stations at the Hilo meeting, noted that  with the Cobras, &#8220;sixty percent of events are ordnance related.&#8221; He  noted, however, that the Marines&#8217; Cobras did not fire any ordnance  containing DU.<\/p>\n<p>The new aircraft probably would create some jobs  in the islands &#8211; especially construction jobs. Ironically, despite the  choppers&#8217; and Ospreys&#8217; go-anywhere mission, one big ticket item involved  in moving them here could be the construction of new landing pads at  Schofield and elsewhere. Marine spokesperson James Sibley told the  Weekly that while there were &#8220;no plans&#8221; currently for new helipads at  Pohakuloa, &#8220;Right now PTA can barely support the operators of the  helicopters that we have here&#8221;: that downwash could potentially lift the  existing runway&#8217;s steel mesh material, causing damage.<\/p>\n<p>Despite  their obvious differences, the Marines joined the protestors in an  opening pule, or Hawaiian prayer. A court reporter typed continuously  during the protestor&#8217;s testimony, apparently taking it down.<\/p>\n<p>Members of the public who missed the meetings are encouraged to visit the project&#8217;s website, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mcbh.usmc.mil\/22h1eis\">http:\/\/www.mcbh.usmc.mil\/22h1eis<\/a> to submit online testimony, or to mail comments to Department of the  Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific, Attn: EV21, MV  22\/H-1 EIS Manager, Makalapa Drive, Suite 100, Pearl Harbor, HI  96860-3134.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The full extent of military expansion at Pohakuloa is only becoming more evident. The Army website for the Pohakuloa Training Areas Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement can be accessed here. Written comments on the proposed action and alternatives will be accepted via e-mail (ptapeis@bah.com) and U.S. mail until February 7, 2011 to:\u00a0 PTA PEIS, P.O. Box &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/?p=8306\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;More on military expansion on Pohakuloa&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[159,7,4,2391],"tags":[2409,9],"class_list":["post-8306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-the-news","category-hawaii","category-kauai","category-maui-molokai-lanai-kahoolawe","tag-movements-resistance","tag-pohakuloa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8306"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8306"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8306\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8308,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8306\/revisions\/8308"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmzhawaii.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}