Editorial: Army has not made case for Makua plan

Posted on: Sunday, June 14, 2009

Army has not made case for Makua plan

Forging a military operations plan that adequately balances training needs with environmental and community concerns is a difficult prospect even under ideal circumstances.

There’s no question: Our troops must be allowed to train and as a community, we need to do our part to support that.

Unfortunately, the history of the Army’s use of Makua Military Reservation has yielded circumstances that are anything but ideal, which complicates the matter of striking a balance immeasurably.

Having live-fire training so close to populated areas has drawn its own fire from residents who don’t like the intrusion of flyovers and explosion noise into their enjoyment of home and recreation areas. But in particular the wildfires produced by that weapons training – suspended since 2005 – is what has eroded any trust that existed between Wai’anae Coast residents and the Army.

Acres of vegetation, including endangered species, were destroyed. Indeed, incendiary devices in a region that is prone to brushfires anyway is worrisome for people who live in neighboring housing areas.

It’s in this context that the Army’s final environmental impact statement on Makua training seems to fall short. The analysis does not adequately make the case for the Army’s “preferred alternative,” one that would authorize the maximum use of the valley with the minimum restrictions on the weaponry to be used. Surely the training objectives can be achieved through less destructive proceedings.

The bottom line, according to the EIS, is that the Army needs to train in an area that can accommodate what are called “convoy live-fire training exercises” for an entire company of troops. Makua is one, but the training area at Pohakuloa on the Big Island is also big enough, as well as being more insulated from residential areas and less vulnerable to environmental damage.

The Army favors the most expansive Makua plan, one that would enable up to 50 company-level exercises per year and 200 convoy live-fire exercises annually, events that could involve tube-launched missiles, rockets and illumination munitions.

The rationale is that the Army needs large training sites on O’ahu because time between deployments can be short and moving everything to Pohakuloa would be costlier.

Opponents acknowledge that leaving O’ahu means less time with families, but they argue persuasively that this disadvantage is offset by what Big Island training offers: Packing and heading off to Pohakuloa is more realistic preparation for actual deployments.

Pohakuloa is still being built out for these operations, so the Army could make the case for using the O’ahu valley on a temporary basis. Even so, Makua isn’t quite ready, either; erosion has damaged the essential firefighting access roads, so repair work would push off when such operations could resume in Wai’anae.

And whatever temporary use might be necessary in Makua, there’s no compelling reason for taking the most environmentally damaging route possible.

Before making its final decision on training operations in the next month, Army officials need to carefully consider the concerns of the community and realize that this decision will surely impact that relationship going forward.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009906140339

Sound off on Army training in Makua

Posted on: Sunday, June 14, 2009

Army training in Makua

Advertiser Staff

The release last week of the Environmental Impact Statement regarding live-fire training in Makua Valley reignited the debate over the valley’s fate and raised some familiar questions. Should the Army be allowed to resume live-fire training in Makua, given its proximity to inhabited areas? Is Pöhakuloa on the Big Island a better option? Tell us what you think and share your views with key decisionmakers.

GET INVOLVED

Contact your elected officials to make your views known:

U.S. Sen. Daniel Inouye: Sen. Inouye has been a key supporter of allowing the Army to train in Makua Valley.

Reach him at: http://inouye.senate.gov – click on “contact me” or (202) 224-3934; Honolulu office: 541-2542.

U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie: Rep. Abercrombie thinks there are better alternatives for live-fire training than Makua Valley.

Reach him at: neil.abercrombie@mail.house.gov or (202) 225-2726; Honolulu office: 541-2570.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009906190317

Op Ed: Army doesn’t need Makua Valley for live-fire exercises

HonoluluAdvertiser.com

June 19, 2009

Army doesn’t need Makua Valley for live-fire exercises

Troops have trained elsewhere for years; other option needed

By David Henkin

“Let them train!” has been the rallying cry of Sen. Daniel Inouye and others who want the Army to resume live-fire exercises in Makua Valley.

It’s an emotionally compelling plea. Who would want to send our young men and women into battle without adequate preparation?

Unfortunately, it’s a highly charged, even deceptive, plea that serves to deflect attention from the real issue. It’s not whether the Army should train, but where.

Is a valley sacred to Hawaiians the best place to fire mortars and artillery – activities that have already damaged petroglyphs and other ancient cultural sites there?

Is the home to nearly 50 endangered and threatened species the best place to fire tracers and illumination rounds – the same weapons that have already sparked hundreds of fires, destroying the native forest and threatening rare plants and animals with extinction?

Is an area just three miles from Makaha’s homes and businesses, across the street from a public beach, the best place to stage a mock battle – using very real weapons and live ammunition?

Many don’t think so, which is why Malama Makua and Earthjustice have spent 11 years in court to compel the Army to give an honest accounting of the price we pay when soldiers train at Makua and to explore alternatives that would accomplish the Army’s mission without sacrificing Makua’s cultural and biological treasures.

The Army’s recently released environmental impact statement confirms Makua is not the only option. The Army admits it would be both feasible and reasonable to conduct its training at Pohakuloa on the Big Island, with much less risk of environmental damage. Indeed, the Army has already been using Pohakuloa to train troops for deployment and has emphasized the added benefit of giving soldiers based on O’ahu a realistic opportunity to practice deployment.

The Army has not trained at Makua since June 2004, and has conducted no live-fire training there in eight of the last 11 years. Yet even without Makua, it has successfully prepared its soldiers for battle.

How can Army officials, or Sen. Inouye, validly claim Makua is essential when the military’s own actions over the past decade have proven otherwise?

Quite simply, they can’t, because it isn’t.

Makua, which was pressed into service following the attack on Pearl Harbor, has had its day. As Congressman Neil Abercrombie has pointed out, based on his years of service on the Armed Services Committee, Makua is best suited for training soldiers for the trench warfare characteristic of WWI, not to meet the needs of the 21st century.

Makua was never intended to be a permanent training site. The Army promised to return it upon the cessation of hostilities with Japan, but 64 years later, the people of Hawai’i are still waiting.

Of the options identified under the EIS, Makua Valley and its resources are the most fragile, vulnerable and irreplaceable. Yet the Army has chosen Makua as its preferred alternative for the highest conceivable level of training, employing some of its most destructive weapons.

While we might expect this sort of environmental and cultural insensitivity from the Bush administration, it’s not a good fit with Hawai’i-born President Obama, who has a special understanding of the Islands.

But no matter who occupies the White House, using Makua Valley as a mock battleground doesn’t make sense. Not when Makua is unique – but its training opportunities are not.

Yes, let them train. But there’s no need to sacrifice Makua to do it.

David Henkin is a Honolulu-based Earthjustice attorney who has been involved with the Makua case since 1998. He wrote this commentary for The Advertiser.

Demonstration against Military Occupation of Waimanalo

Please support this action by the Waimanalo residents to resist the military build up in their c0mmunity.

On 6/18/09 8:05 AM, “iwalani keliihoomalu” <keliihoomalu@hotmail.com> wrote:

Aloha,

We are organizing a peaceful demonstration of protest. We the positive re-action along with other soverign groups will be coming together to take a stand. We will be excercising our right to say enough is enough. The health center is our place that provides us and continues to service and meet our needs. We have been in discussion with them to release a portion of land that they do not need but chooses to excercise the authority of power to keep us oppressed and seperate us from the land of our inherent birth right. The choice to continue to flaunt it and continually push their military authority is a misuse of their authority antagonizes the whole situation. Which instigates a reaction. Join us in an effort to take a stand and say not in waimanalo and not at the waimanalo health center. We will be in front on Kalanianaole Hwy across from Bellow Air Force Base to hold signs and let them know we do not agree and there is something wrong in their decision. We will be parking on mauka side in Bellows and using Tinker Road as a cross walk to hold signs. We will be there from 9:00 am- 1:00pm. Bring chair, water and your message. I can be reached at 954-7124.

Aloha kakou,
Mabel Ann & Solomon C. Spencer Jr. & Kawehi Kanui Gill

Who : Waimanalo community
What: “Peaceful Demonstration of Protest”
When: June 27, 2009 Saturday
Time: 9:00 am – 1 pm
Where: In front of Bellow’s Air Force Base on Kalanianaole
Why: To support the Waimanalo Community in protest of the closing of our bellow beach and the return of our Native lands.

Join us and take a stand and add your voice in support.


—–Original Message—–
From: May Akamine
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 6:04 PM
To: All Staff
Subject: Signs in Back of Waimanalo Health Center

All Staff –

Just want you to know that a contractor from the military posted 2 “No Trespassing” signs behind our clinic- see attached photos. Please leave the signs as is; please do not deface it; do not remove it, etc. But, please feel free to continue to walk/work in our Garden.

I will be contacting the military PR liaison Major Crouch, w/ cc to our Board of Directors, our Waimanalo Neighborhood Board Chair Kekoa Ho, Representative Chris Lee, etc. to find out what is going on. I’ll get back to you all when I get more info. Mahalo for your cooperation.

signs-by-waimanalo-health-ctr-adult-clinic-6-17-091 signs-by-waimanalo-health-ctr-garden-6-17-091

Aloha –
May Akamine, RN, MS
Executive Director
Waimanalo Health Center
41-1347 Kalanianaole Hwy
Waimanalo, HI 96795
Personal Line: (808) 954-7107
Cell: (808) 225-9614
Clinic Phone: (808) 259-7948
Fax: (808) 259-6449
www.waimanalohc.org <http://www.waimanalohc.org/>

Why We Must Protect Makua Valley

Mahalo nui to Kehau Watson for this positive editorial calling for protection of Makua.

Why We Must Protect Makua Valley

June 14th, 2009 by Trisha Kehaulani Watson

“E mālama i ka makua, he mea laha ‘ole.”

Mary Kawena Pukui explained this ‘ōlelo no‘eau to mean “parents should be cared for, for when they are gone, there are none to replace them.” To Hawaiians, Mākua Valley in Wai‘anae represents our parents; Mākua is a kinolau or physical body form of the parents of all Hawaiians. A particularly sacred place, or wahi pana, the protection of Mākua remains as of vital import to Native Hawaiians as the protection and caring for our human parents. The occupation and desecration of Mākua is both a physical and spiritual offensive against the residing indigenous people of this land.

Mākua’s rich history extends back as many as thirty-five generations, as early as the 8th century. Mākua houses a rich spiritual history that reflects its deep significance to the Hawaiian people. Even today, as one stands in the valley, hō‘ailona appear regularly to those who help mālama Mākua. Whether in the form of clouds, timely and pointed winds (called makani, a Hawaiian word also meaning ghost or spirit), or images that appear in the mountains or valley floor, signs or hō‘ailona serve as telling reminders of the powerful spirituality of Mākua.

In 1977, renowned anthropologist Marion Kelly would lead a study on Mākua for the Bishop Museum that collected extensive interviews and documents on Mākua that served as one of the first studies to respectfully include the spiritual history of a place. Kelly’s study now serves as a vital repository for the cultural and social history of Mākua. In her study, she places strong emphasis upon folklore and spiritual knowledges.

References of this second and spiritual form of knowledge or being can be commonly found in certain parts of our language. Specifically, in concepts like ‘ike pāpālua, or second sight or knowledge. Mary Kawena Pukui defines this term as “To see double; to have the gift of second sight and commune with the spirits; supernatural knowedge.” This references the idea that knowledge or understanding for Hawaiians came in part from a spiritual realm or from akua, the gods. Another similar concept is ‘ike pāpālua, or second form. Pukui explains this term: “to have a dual form, as the demigod Kama-pua‘a, who could change from man to hog.” Mākua served as home to a similar figure, the mo‘o of Mākua.

In heavy rains, the mo‘o come down the stream from Ko‘iahi to meet her boyfriend, the shark from Kāneana Cave. When the stream flows strong, it breaks through the sand beach and flows into the sea. The mo‘o goes into the sea and goes on the big rock next to the blow hole at the Wai‘anae end of the beach. The rock is called Pōhaku-kū-la‘i-la‘i. On this rock, she would turn herself into a beautiful princess and call to him. The shark would come out of Kāneana Cave through the undersea channel and swim out to the blow-hole. He would then turn into a man, and he and the princess would make love. When they were ready they would go to live in the stream. And when the water is green the mo‘o is in the stream. When it is clear she is not. No swimming is allowed when the mo‘o is in the stream.

Another important part of Mākua was the cave, known to local residents as “Kaneana Cave.” One woman recollects: “And my father was there to oversee when they opened the cave. And my father said, ‘His human form of [Kaneana] is still up on that hill, and he watches for you when you go to the beach to go swimming, or to try and catch fish. He can change himself to a shark and come and get you and bring you in that cave and eat you.'” Mākua remains particularly alive with traditions that speak to the natural resource management of the area. Yet, mo`olelo were also used to teach proper behavior.

A resident recollects about the lessons she learned at the cave in Mākua.

The entrance of that cave is out by the long reef they call Papaloa. And she has an opening underneath. If you go way out to the end, and you just stand like that, you will see a big opening. And he enters through there, and he can have anyone that treats him mean. That is where he takes them, down below. If you ever entered that cave, you will see the water. Down below, there’s a pool. We were made to crawl into that cave, and we didn’t want to go. Just to teach us a lesson we went. And when we went, and the time he took his captives all in there, and then he killed them, the blood. And it [the cave] is a beautiful thing. And the only thing that got me scared was the sharks (sic) head. It was a big sharks (sic) head right on the stone. I don’t know if ______. [Dad said,] “Pretty soon you’ll be one of them, lady, because of your big mouth.” I have a bad temper, and in that cave I kept my mouth shut. Now you crawl out. That is how he gets out and changes into a man. Lot of the old folks and the children named him if we disobeyed. We were not as fussy then. No, no, we do it, we do it.

The lessons present in traditional folklore also contained social values and community norms. Mākua teaches us about our culture and our history, as a parent does its child.

Story-telling and cultural narratives speak to history, contemporary norms, resource management, essentially every aspect of life. When those narratives are silenced, entire histories can be effectively wiped away.

The military can no longer deny Mākua’s critical cultural and ecological importance. An alternative site for military activities and live-free training, which the Army is currently attempting to resume in the valley, must be found.

Source: http://hehawaiiau.honadvblogs.com/2009/06/14/why-we-must-protect-makua-valley/

Marines train for Afghanistan war in Waimanalo

Marines prepare for Afghanistan in Waimanalo “village”

By Gregg K. Kakesako

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Jun 15, 2009

Sgt. Michael Osburn cautiously led his squad of Kaneohe Marines into the remote village.

With him was Lance Cpl. Robert Bacigalupo. Like many in his squad of 14 Marines, this was Bacigalupo’s first time in a combat zone. The town was littered with plastic bottles, discarded car tires, rags, trash and items Marines call “battlefield clutter.” Loud music from a nearby mosque echoed through the town square.

Osburn, relying on his experiences from earlier Afghan and Iraq combat tours, reached for a pack of Marlboros in his combat vest as he began his “meet and greets” with the locals in the town square. He’s learned that cigarettes were the quickest way to prove that his squad’s intentions were friendly.

As he met with the town’s leaders, an insurgent sniper cut down three of his Marines. Osburn quickly apologized to the mayor for his abrupt departure and turned to handle the crisis.

The crisis and the Afghani village, however, were not real, but rather a combat drill at the Marine’s two-year-old urban warfare training site in Waimanalo last week.

Here Kaneohe’s “Lava Dogs” were preparing for a seven-month deployment to Afghanistan.

Before they leave for Afghanistan, Osburn and the more than 900 Kaneohe Marines belonging to the 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, will be participating in numerous battle drills and combat scenarios at Kaneohe Bay, Waimanalo, Pohakuloa Training Area on the Big Island and the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center at Twentynine Palms, Calif., about halfway between Los Angeles and Las Vegas.

This will be the battalion’s fifth combat tour. It went to Afghanistan in 2006 and was sent to Iraq in 2004, 2007 and again last year.

Osburn, who deployed to Afghanistan in 2006, said parts of the country resemble the training areas in the mountains near Kahuku.

Last week Bravo Company, with about 180 Marines, completed part of its first phase of training at Bellows Air Force Station, where shipping containers have been used to replicate an Afghan town. The containers are painted tan with windows and doors cut into them. Some are stacked on top of one another to transform them into two-story buildings, which are supposed to be Afghan schools, government offices and shops. There was even a turquoise wooden dome added to one of the shipping container complexes to make it look like a mosque.

The Marines get a quick critique after each exercise. After one session, Staff Sgt. Lee LeGrande, an exercise controller, praised Osburn for using cigarettes to get closer to the “villagers” and for apologizing to the mayor before breaking off his courtesy visit.

However, LeGrande also criticized the squad for failing to get approval before firing on the “mosque” where the Marines believed the sniper had been hiding. He also cautioned the squad to be more careful before aiding the wounded Marines or they could end up becoming a victim of the sniper.

Chief Warrant Officer Craig Marshall, a battalion gunner who has done four Iraqi combat tours, said during the first phase Marines are taught basics of the culture where they will be deployed; procedures and techniques necessary to man a vehicle checkpoint and conduct patrols through villages and towns; and ways to identify the various homemade bombs used by insurgents.

Nearly 50 Afghan nationals were recruited in Southern California and brought to Hawaii. They not only participated in checkpoint and village exercises but also prepared Afghani dishes for the Marines to sample.

The Kaneohe Marines will spend a couple of weeks at Pohakuloa later this summer where intense live-fire exercises will be held. They will then return to Waimanalo and live and work for several days in the same training area, which will be turned into an Afghan forward operating base. In September the 1st Battalion will spend nearly a month at Twentynine Palms before going on leave and deploying to Afghanistan at the end of the year.

Source: http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090615_Marines_prepare_for_Afghanistan_at_a_village_in_Waimanalo.html

Army lists 22 Makua cleanup areas

Posted on: Saturday, June 13, 2009

Army lists Makua cleanup areas

Ordnance removal at 22 cultural sites will increase access
By Will Hoover
Advertiser Staff Writer

The Army yesterday released a final list of 22 cultural sites on Makua Military Reservation deemed “high priority” for clearance of unexploded ordnance.

The purpose of removing potentially dangerous explosives from those sites is to increase access to those cultural areas, an Army media release said.

The action follows a lawsuit filed nearly a decade ago against the Army by Earthjustice in Hawai’i.

That suit resulted in an agreement in October 2001 that the Army would produce such a site list within one year.

After the Army failed to provide the list within the time period, the issue lingered in federal court for more than six years, until U.S. District Judge Susan Oki Mollway clarified the original agreement this year and ordered the Army to comply.

David Henkin, attorney for Earthjustice, yesterday said Earthjustice is happy with the outcome, but said it should not have taken so long.

“It took almost seven years longer than it was supposed to, and it took going back to court twice, but the Army finally did come out with a list of of high-priority sites, and they did provide an opportunity for public input,” Henkin said. “And so we’re pleased.”

Henkin said Earthjustice would monitor the Army’s progress in clearing out the unexploded ordnance and in allowing access to the cultural sites.

The Army’s clearance procedure, made in accordance with a plan adopted by Mollway, requires the military to submit quarterly progress reports.

Copies of the Army’s list are available at the Hawai’i State Library, Wai’anae Public Library, Kapolei Public Library or at www.garrison.hawaii.army.mil/sitelistmmr.

Reach Will Hoover at whoover@honoluluadvertiser.com.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090613/NEWS23/906130325/Army+lists+Makua+cleanup+areas

Sen. Inouye weighs in on Makua

Predictably, Sen. Inouye has penned an editorial supporting the Army’s proposed expanded training in Makua valley. Let’s analyze his argument:

1. Army is a “good neighbor”.

The US military was the force that overthrew the Hawaiian Kingdom and occupied Hawai’i. Capt. Alfred Thayer Mahan to Teddy Roosevelt (1897): “take (Hawaii) first and solve (political questions) afterwards.” I wouldn’t consider anyone who covets and takes over his neighbor’s house a “good neighbor”.

2. Hawaii soldiers will be called to war; they need training.

What are the troops training for? The US is engaged in illegal, imperial wars to invade and occupy other peoples’ countries. Phiippines, Korea, Vietnam, and even WWII, the “good war”, was a struggle between two imperial camps. In the Pacific, Japan lost and the US took the spoils, creating an “American Lake”. Hawai’i’s sacred places should not be used to perpetuate empire.

3. The Army has trained in Makua for more than 60 years, virtually forever.

The US military illegally occupies lands of the Hawaiian Kingdom and seized private lands. The military evicted families from Makua and destroyed their community. They promised to return the lands after WWII, but lied.

4. The Army’s concern for the environment goes beyond Makua; they helped to pay for the purchase of lands to be placed in public land trusts.

Many people saw this coming: The use of military funds to help purchase and protect certain areas as “buffers” for military training would be used as part of the psychological operations to win the hearts and minds of, or at least neutralize resistance from the community, in this case environmentalists.

5. The Army is part of our ‘ohana.

The military is taking our ‘ohana to fight wars for the empire, much like the Romans enlisted subjugated peoples to fight in its legions. Military training in Hawai’i, going back to the earliest JROTC programs at Kamehameha Schools and McKinley High School in the early 1900s were intended to indoctrinate Hawaiian, Japanese and other Local youth into military/American identity and ideology. In 1924 General Charles P. Summerall, commander of the Hawaiian Department for the US Army and one of the more open-minded racists, wrote: “the Japanese students showed themselves to be capable of becoming very efficient military students. There is no better way of securing the loyalty of such people than to incorporate them in our military forces with the environment of obligation to duty that cannot fail to win their allegiance in most if not all cases. Such a course would also tend to remove the resentment that Japanese citizens now feel at the discrimination that is made against them.”  From Senator Inouye’s editorial, you might conclude that the military’s social engineering experiment worked.

+++

June 7, 2009

Let Army resume training at Makua

By Daniel K. Inouye

On Friday, the Army released the final environmental impact statement for military training activities at the Makua Military Reservation. Completion of this EIS culminates a seven-year effort that studied the effects of live-fire training on the cultural and natural resources of the valley. This includes an extensive marine resources study and a subsurface archaeological survey.

I encourage the people of Hawai’i to review all the information. In doing so, I hope you will come to the same conclusion: Let them train.

The Army is a good neighbor and longtime member of our community. It has taken its responsibility very seriously, and has come to the conclusion that it can sufficiently mitigate the risks inherent in conducting live-fire training exercises in the valley. Rather than continuing to nitpick at one thing or another, and force a return yet again to court, serving only to delay critical training that could provide the difference between life and death, I respectfully suggest that we, as a community, stand up and say, “We’ve had enough of these delay tactics – let them train.”

Today, there are about 6,200 Hawai’i Army, Marine and National Guard warriors deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. With an increased military presence planned for Afghanistan, we should expect continued deployments in the foreseeable future. North Korea’s irresponsible taunting, as evidenced by its recent missile launches and its provocative future launch plans, have heightened already soaring tensions in the Pacific region. No doubt if there were an incident, our Hawai’i-based units could be among the first to respond. They must be able to train.

Our warriors should not be penalized and placed in harm’s way in faraway places without receiving the training they need to protect themselves, get the job done and return home safely. We also should not extend their time away from their families by forcing them to train in another state. Keep in mind that less than 1 percent of Americans are willing to make the sacrifice to wear our nation’s uniform. They deserve our support, as they serve to preserve our way of life. Let them train.

Makua Valley is a critical training asset for the Army, Marines and National Guard. It has been used as a live-fire training area for more than 60 years. In 1998, training was halted as a result of a lawsuit. Training was then allowed on a negotiated, limited basis following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, while the EIS was being prepared. As the memory of Sept. 11 faded, training was again halted in the summer of 2004, pending completion of the EIS. So, here we are today, with the final EIS in front of us.

The Army has maintained Makua Valley as a training area, while at the same time steadfastly continuing its efforts to protect the endangered species and cultural sites, including removing ordnance to allow reasonable access for cultural practitioners. About $4 million annually is spent for this purpose. In addition, more than $6 million to date has been set aside for the removal of ordnance in Makua Valley, and in near-ocean waters opposite the valley.

More than 30 technically-trained field biologists manage the natural resources in Makua Valley. They have planted about 4,000 endangered plants, controlled the weeds, and built fences to protect endangered species. Another $1 million is spent annually to preserve archeological sites in the valley. To date, 121 sites have been identified for study and protection. I would venture that very few other entities have the resources and the commitment to take as good care of Makua Valley as the Army.

The Hawai’i Army’s environmental stewardship goes beyond the valley. It is a willing public partner in conserving special lands, and has invested more than $10 million in recent years alone to support the acquisition of Waimea Valley, Pupukea-Paumalu, Moanalua Valley and, very shortly, the Honouliuli preserve along the Wai’anae mountain range.

Each year, the Army spends about $365 million for its support in Hawai’i. Estimated spending for privatized Army housing construction and maintenance already tops $736 million. Add another $598 million for military construction provided just in the past two years including stimulus funds. All of this supports our economy during these difficult times.

Most important to me, however, the Hawai’i Army is a part of our ‘ohana. It’s not about “us and them,” but rather a much larger “we and our.” We volunteer together at the Food Bank and Special Olympics. Our children are learning side-by-side with one another. Our moms and dads are coaching young athletes together on the soccer and baseball fields.

Our soldiers deserve our support. They deserve the best training we can provide to prepare them for battle in faraway lands. The Army has done their part. It’s time to do ours – let them train.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090607/OPINION03/906070342/Let+Army+resume+training+at+Makua

Makua EIS rejected by Malama Makua

Hawaiian group says EIS on Makua is not complete

By Mary Adamski

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Jun 06, 2009

The Army said it will decide by early July to what extent it will resume live-fire military training exercises in Makua Valley. The training plan was part of an environmental impact statement released yesterday.

But Malama Makua, the nonprofit organization whose lawsuit forced the Army to halt exercises in the 4,190-acre Leeward valley, said it will be back in court to stop the Army again from resuming training because the environmental assessment is flawed and incomplete.

“We don’t share the Army view that this is a final copy,” said Earthjustice attorney David Henkin, who represents Malama Makua. “They don’t provide the legally required information,” Henkin said.

He said one example of insufficient assessment came in a “shellfish study” portion released by the Army Corps of Engineers in January. Intended to determine whether marine life that is consumed by people would be contaminated by minerals from military weaponry, the study only looked at two of the four marine categories required, and examined areas affected by sewage outfall pollution and urban runoff. “We hired experts to look at their study,” Henkin said. “I wrote a letter that they ought to withdraw this document.”

The Army favors using the Makua Military Reservation up to 50 days over a 242-day training year for infantry squad- and platoon-level exercises using multiple weaponry including missiles, rockets and illumination munitions. That is the highest usage among five alternatives assessed in the EIS. It would also allow up to 200 convoy live-fire exercises. “This alternative would allow the Army to train its units with maximum realistic training using critical weapons systems,” according to the EIS report.

“It will be Army leadership in Hawaii, in conjunction with leadership in Washington, D.C., who make the decision about how Makua is going to be used, if used at all,” said Loren Doane, public affairs officer for U.S. Army Garrison, Hawaii.

Doane said the Army prepared a list of all cultural sites within the valley as required by the federal court.

Relocating targets away from known cultural features is one of the “mitigation measures” listed in the EIS. Other public concerns about the damage and disturbance to natural resources and cultural sites, which came out in public hearings after the draft EIS was released in September, show up as “mitigation measures” to protect native plants, prevent soil erosion, deter brush fires and even minimize Army convoy effects on traffic.

The federal court ordered the Army to prepare an environmental impact assessment after Makua Malama filed suit in 1998 claiming that military use was harming natural and cultural resources. The Army agreed to halt live-fire training but was allowed to resume after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It was halted again in 2005 until the EIS was completed.

“It is important for people to remember that … in all that time, soldiers have been trained, they have performed their tasks while receiving training elsewhere,” Henkin said. “Training at Makua is not the only place the Army has said it can accomplish its mission. People of Hawaii need to ask why the Army is pursuing the most destructive course of action.”

Source: http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090606_Hawaiian_group_says_EIS_on_Makua_is_not_complete.html

Makua Military training: “wasting lives, land, money, energy and resources”

Joan Conrow wrote on her blog about the Army’s recently released final EIS for live fire training in Makua valley:

Now if only the military would pack up and leave, too, instead of pressing ahead with its controversial, and contested, plans to conduct live fire training exercises among the endangered species and archeological sites of Makua Valley. And as The Advertiser reports, good old Sen. Dan – surprise! – is solidly on board, albeit shaky in his facts:

Inouye, a World War II combat veteran who lost his arm in battle, said the Army is a good neighbor and longtime member of the community.

Rep. Neil Abercrombie sees things a little differently:

“Makua as a training site was acquired in the wake of the Pearl Harbor attack in WW II and never intended to be permanent,” Abercrombie said. “Alternatives which match the training needs of a 21st-century Army are available.”

Sort of like how Kahoolawe, similarly acquired in WWII, was never intended to be a permanent bombing target. And some 50 years later, following intense public pressure, the Navy did finally beat it – leaving its devastation and unexploded ordnance behind.

What a waste. But then, that’s what the military is all about: wasting lives, land, money, energy and resources.

Right on!