Military to hikers: Take up indoor hobbies

Military to Guam residents: We will take your ancestral land and resources. So you won’t be able to fish, hunt, conduct traditional cultural practices, but you can go bowling or roller skating instead.  Wow, score!

>><<

http://mvguam.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10053:military-to-hikers-take-up-indoor-hobbies&catid=1:guam-local-news&Itemid=2

HIKING, FISHING FORFEIT IN GUAM MILITARY LAND GRAB

Marine Corps suggests residents turn to indoor activities

By Jude Lizama

HAGÅTÑA, Guam (Marianas Variety, Dec. 18, 2009) – SINCE bonnie stompers are likely to lose access to jungles and cultural sites on the island of Guam, the military is suggesting that hikers switch to indoor hobbies.

The Marine Corps Community Service has proposed various quality of life facilities such as hobby shop, indoor physical fitness centers, and indoor recreational resources such as bowling, skating rink, youth center, theater and recreational pavilion.

These are among the alternative recreations cited by the military in the draft environmental impact statement.

“By presenting alternate recreational options to the potential users, impacts to the recreational resources on non-DoD (Department of Defense) lands in north Guam could be lessened,” the study cited.

A significant portion of nonmilitary acreage on the east coast of the island, in addition to the loss of some of the island’s recreational and cultural sites, may be confiscated as a result of the training range complex construction alternatives proposed within the draft environmental impact statement.

According to the impact study, “There are several recreational resources that the public would lose the access to, and the use of the features if the proposed action were implemented: Guam International Raceway, Marbo Cave, Pagat Trail and associated trails near it, cultural gathering activities (suruhana), and off-shore fishing near Marbo Cave.”

Through the possible implementation of Training Complex Alternative A, the U.S. military would look to acquire 921 acres of nonmilitary land located east of both Andersen South and Route 15. This alternative would also require 1.7 miles of Route 15 to be realigned. Alternative B could possible would see the military take 1,129 acres with no realignment to Route 15.

If conducted, both of the training facility options would consist of live fire ranges under the classifications of known distance, unknown distance, pistol, square-bay, and machine gun; in addition to range control, range roads, range towers, and proposed special use airspace.

Additionally, the study cited that “Implementation of [Main Cantonment] Alternative 1, regardless of the Training Complex Alternatives A or B, would cause the cessation of the present activities at all the resources mentioned because the Known Distance Range Complex is proposed in that location. The loss of Guam International Raceway land and use would be an adverse impact. Therefore, [Main Cantonment] Alternative 1 would result in significant impacts to recreational resources.”

“Heightened awareness and education about environmentally sensitive areas,” will contribute toward “minimizing deterioration of resources,” the draft study says. “The general wear and tear of the amenities available and the conditions of the recreational resources would likely be accelerated due to the presence of potential users.”

PBS to air program on military expansion on Guam

Why Are We Sending Thousands of Military Personnel to Guam?

Tuesday 08 December 2009

by: NOW | t r u t h o u t | Programming Note

Why are we sending thousands of military personnel to Guam? Next on “NOW.” Over the next five years, as many as 30,000 service members and their families will descend on the small island of Guam, nearly tripling its presence there. It’s part of a larger agreement that the US signed with Japan to realign American forces in the Pacific. But how will this multibillion-dollar move impact the lives and lifestyle of Guam’s nearly 180,000 residents? On Friday, December 11, at 8:30 PM (PBS Hawaii will air the program at 8:00 pm), “NOW” on PBS travels to the US territory of Guam to find out whether their environment and infrastructure can support such a large and quick infusion of people, and why the buildup is vital to our national security.

Chamoru and allies protest the military expansion

http://thedrowningmermaid.blogspot.com/2009/11/honk-if-you-hear-me.html

On Friday, November 20, the day the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Guam Military Expansion was released, there was a demonstration against the U.S. military expansion in Guam.     The Drowning Mermaid blog carried a report and  photos from the action.  Here’s a few excerpts:

I don’t think it’s uncommon to stay silent on an issue when you think no one else is on your team. But there are times when you start to whisper it to people near you, only to find out that there are many like you, sitting quietly in the corners trying to avoid being the odd man out. After a while, you get the sense that there are a ton of individuals who share the same fears, grievances, and goals. You start wondering why the hell no one is saying anything if everyone feels the same way.
But as the author found out, people are beginning to understand the impact of the military expansion on their island and are starting to speak out:
We’re so used to being told no one cares. But it’s not true. People do care; and once they see that others care, they feel more empowered to take action. There were many people who were truly happy to see us; and it showed just how much our island worries about the ramifications of this huge movement. There are many residents who are also not sold on this “deal” the Department of Defense is trying to push on us.
Biba Chamoru!  Resist the military invasion!

Heritage Foundation report rehashes Manifest Destiny

The Heritage Foundation, the notorious Right Wing think tank published its 2009 book of charts on the Asia-Pacific region.  It is all rehashed Mahan, “American Lake”, “Manifest Destiny”:

The United States is no less a Pacific nation than an Atlantic one. The state of Hawaii and the territories of Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa all lie in the Pacific. The United States has five treaty alliances in East Asia (Japan, Korea, Australia, the Philippines and Thailand), the Pacific Fleet, and major military bases throughout the region. It has legal obligations to Taiwan’s security, and a burgeoning economic relationship with mainland China.

America’s presence in Asia is massive and deliberate. It is the product of more than 100 years of commitment and sacrifice, including the Spanish-American War, World War 11, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and today’s war in Afghanistan.

It’s laughable that one of their charts is titled “State of Political Freedom” and it shows a list of Asia-Pacific countries on a scale of Free, Partly Free and Not Free.   But under “Not Free” there is no mention of colonies, such as the U.S. colonies of Guam, Northern Marianas, and American Samoa or the French colonies of Tahiti Nui and Kanaky.  U.S. neo-colonies of Palau, Marshall Islands and Micronesia are mistakenly listed as “Free”.   And naturally, the U.S. occupation of Hawai’i is not mentioned, when it ought to be under “Not Free”.
Another distortion is the chart titled “China’s Military Size Dominates Asia” where the Heritage Foundation shows troop numbers as the measure of military dominance.  But the more appropriate measurement would look at military expenditures, of which the U.S. dominates globally with almost half of total military expenditures, or foreign military bases, of which the U.S. is unrivaled, or nuclear weapons, or aircraft carriers, or submarines…  The Heritage Foundation is hyping the China threat to justify a more aggressive and robust military posture in the region.
>><<
http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/wp112409a.cfm
November 24, 2009

Key Asian Indicators: A 2009 Book of Charts

by Walter Lohman, John Fleming and Nicholas Hamisevicz
White Paper

The United States is no less a Pacific nation than an Atlantic one. The state of Hawaii and the territories of Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa all lie in the Pacific. The United States has five treaty alliances in East Asia (Japan, Korea, Australia, the Philippines and Thailand), the Pacific Fleet, and major military bases throughout the region. It has legal obligations to Taiwan’s security, and a burgeoning economic relationship with mainland China.

In South Asia, the United States is establishing a multifaceted partnership with India; it has a critical partner in nuclear-armed Pakistan; and is leading a war against global terrorism in Afghanistan.

America’s presence in Asia is massive and deliberate. It is the product of more than 100 years of commitment and sacrifice, including the Spanish-American War, World War 11, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and today’s war in Afghanistan.

The United States is in Asia to stay The graphics that follow help to demonstrate why A quick glance is enough to demonstrate the dynamism of the region. Asia is home to more than half the world’s population. Freedom and tyranny live side by side across the region, as do economic opportunity and poverty East and South Asia have some of the best places in the world to do business, but they also have some of the worst. Asia is home to some of the most unstable, dangerous nations in the world, and it is home to some of the most steady and reliable. It is also home to the only country in the world capable of emergng as a peer competitor for global American influence – the People’s Republic of China.

Asia is a work very much in progress. Its sheer size makes its development a determining factor in protecting and promoting American interests and values. Its growth means it will only become more important in the future. And Asia’s dynamism means that nothing about its development can be taken for granted.

Walter Lohman is Director of the Asian Studies Center, John Fleming is Senior Data Graphics Editor, and Nicholas Hamisevicz is a Research Assistant in the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage Foundation.

Draft Environmental Impact Statement available for military expansion on Guam / N. Marianas

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT EIS/OEIS AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS

The Department of the Navy (DoN) and the Joint Guam Program Office (JGPO) announces the availability of the Guam and Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) military relocation Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS). The Draft EIS/OEIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with relocating Marines from Okinawa, Japan to Guam, constructing visiting Aircraft Carrier berthing facilities, and establishing a U.S. Army Air and Missile Defense Task Force on Guam. The Draft EIS also examines off base mission critical, mission support, and community support infrastructure improvements needed to ensure that Joint Region Marianas can provide expanded direct support of the Department of Defense’s strategic mission and operational readiness in the Western Pacific Region.

The Draft EIS/OEIS is available for review at www.guambuildupeis.us and at the following libraries: University of Guam Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Library, Government Documents Tan Siu Lin Building, UOG Station, Mangilao, GU 96923; Nieves M. Flores Memorial Library, 254 Martyr Street, Hagåtña, GU 96910; Joeten‐Kiyu Public Library, P.O. Box 501092, Saipan, MP 96950; Northern Marianas College Olympio T. Borja Memorial Library, P.O. Box 501250, Saipan, MP 96950; and the Tinian Public Library, P.O. Box 520704, Tinian, MP 96952. In addition, a reading

room with copies of the Draft EIS/OEIS for the public to review has been established at Agana Shopping Center. This facility will be open during normal shopping center hours starting from November 21, 2009 to February 17, 2010 so that members of the public can access and review the Draft EIS/OEIS.

The DoN will host public hearings on the islands of Guam, Tinian, and Saipan to receive verbal and written comments on the Draft EIS/OEIS.

The public is encouraged to attend the public hearings, which will be held at the following dates, times, and locations:

Thursday January 7, 2010‐ Southern High School, Santa Rita, Guam, 5:00 pm‐7:00 pm (Open House)

7:00 pm‐ 9:00 pm (Formal Hearing)

Saturday January 9, 2010‐ Field House, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam, 1:00 pm‐3:00 pm (Open House)

3:00 pm‐5:00 pm (Formal Hearing)

Monday January 11, 2010‐ Yigo Gymnasium, Yigo, Guam, 5:00 pm‐7:00 pm (Open House)

7:00 pm‐ 9:00 pm (Formal Hearing)

Tuesday January 12, 2010‐ Okkodo High School, Dededo, Guam, 5:00 pm‐7:00 pm (Open House)

7:00 pm‐ 9:00 pm (Formal Hearing)

Thursday January 14, 2010‐ Tinian Elementary School, San Jose, Tinian 5:00 pm‐7:00 pm (Open House)

7:00 pm‐ 9:00 pm (Formal Hearing)

Friday January 15, 2010‐ Multi Purpose Center, Susupe, Saipan 5:00 pm‐7:00 pm (Open House)

7:00 pm‐ 9:00 pm (Formal Hearing)

An open house will take place during the first two hours of each hearing, followed by a two‐hour formal public hearing. Informational posters will be displayed and subject matter experts will be available during the open house to discuss the findings of the Draft EIS/OEIS and to answer questions from the public.

Oral and/or written comments may be submitted at the public hearings. Translators will be available. Interested agencies, individuals, and groups unable to attend the public hearings are encouraged to provide written comments postmarked no later than February 17, 2010.

Mail comments to: JGPO c/o NAVFAC Pacific

258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100

Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860‐3134

Attention: GPMO

A web‐based comment form can also be submitted at www.guambuildupeis.us.

Federal agencies, government of Guam agencies, government of CNMI agencies, the public, and other interested parties are encouraged to provide oral and/or written comments for consideration in the Final EIS/OEIS. DoN andJGPO will consider all comments received as they develop the Final EIS/OEIS.

Military bases factored into APEC choice

An interview with Charles E. Morrison, President of the East-West Center, which successfully bid for Hawai’i to host the 2011 APEC Summit, confirmed that the military presence was a significant factor in the decision to select Hawai’i.   We can expect to see intensified militarization of Honolulu in preparation for the summit.  When the Asian Development Bank met here in 2001, the Hawaii Tourism Authority bought millions of dollars worth of military-grade weapons, equipment and training for law enforcement agencies in order to suppress dissent.

Obviously the security needs to be good. There’s never been an APEC meeting that’s had any violent protests, but it’s certainly something that people who arrange meetings think about. Everybody expects peaceful protests, and that’s just fine. … Then there’s the general warmth and welcome of the city that’s important. People all over the world know us as a vacation destination; many people just don’t know us as a big international conference site. APEC can change that.

A lot of emphasis has been placed on security, including the physical security of the leaders. You have the military here, you have great existing, secure facilities, and very close at hand. But the other important aspect about security is street crime. Statistically, Honolulu is (much safer) than San Francisco or Los Angeles. I think that was a major aspect, thinking about all those delegates just walking down the street, their basic safety. … Also, it looked like it was such an easy place to work with, you don’t have umpteen small municipal governments that you have to deal with. … And, of course, the fact that we are truly right in the middle of the Pacific.

APEC Summit to be held in Hawai’i in 2011

The East West Center issued a press release announcing that the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit will be held in Hawai’i in November 2011.  If past experience with the Asian Development Bank meeting in Honolulu is an indicator, we should expect that Honolulu will be intensely militarized to prevent protest and disruptions.  Earlier this year, it was reported that “secure military facilities” was a selling point for Hawai’i’s bid for the APEC meeting.

>><<

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Media Contact:

Derek Ferrar,

Media Relations Specialist

808-944-7204

ferrard@eastwestcenter.org

News flash:

Hawai‘i to Host APEC Summit in 2011

HONOLULU (Nov. 14) – President Barack Obama’s selection of Honolulu as the site for the annual APEC Leaders Meeting in November 2011 means that Hawai‘i will both open the U.S. year of hosting APEC with an agenda-setting conference, as well as close the year with the huge Ministerial and Leaders meetings.

President Obama announced Hawai‘i’s winning bid today during a speech at this year’s APEC Leaders Meeting, currently being held in Singapore. Honolulu had already been selected to host the first event, an academic and government officials’ conference and an informal senior officials meeting to be held at the East-West Center in December 2010. Several other smaller ministerial and senior official meetings will be held in other U.S. cities.

East-West Center President Charles E. Morrison, who coordinated the Hawai‘i bid for APEC 2011 and who is currently attending APEC meetings in Singapore, commented: “With at least 19 heads of state, double or triple that number of ministers and many others coming, the annual APEC gathering is one of the world’s largest intergovernmental meetings. The Leaders Meeting in 2011 will be by far the largest such gathering in Hawai‘i’s history.”

APEC, or the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation, is the premier forum for Asia-Pacific economies to cooperate on regional trade and investment issues. Its annual Leaders and Ministerial meetings are attended by heads of state, cabinet ministers, business leaders and the heads of the World Bank and World Trade Organization, among many others. The Hawai‘i meetings, scheduled for November 12-20, 2011 at the Hawai‘i Convention Center, are expected to draw more than 10,000 people to Honolulu, a welcome boost for the state’s struggling tourism industry.

“APEC 2011 will be a big economic boost and provide huge publicity benefits for Hawai‘i,” Morrison said. “There are lots of preparations to be made over the next two years to maximize the benefits of this meeting, including its longer-term implications as a new business opportunity for Hawai‘i. The Singapore APEC meeting now going on shows that, with good planning, APEC can have many benefits without disrupting normal social and business activity.”

APEC’s annual Leader’s Meeting is hosted each year by a different member economy; 2011 is the United States’ first turn to host since the first meeting convened on Blake Island, Washington in 1993.

Morrison noted that federal officials were impressed by the ease of working with Hawai‘i. “I believe that among the many factors contributing to our selection was the close cooperation between the governor, the mayor, our congressional delegation led by Senator Inouye, and the business and tourism communities,” he said. “It is a lot simpler for federal authorities to work with a unified city/county government like Honolulu’s, which is also just a short walk from the governor’s office.”

He added: “The fact that the president is inviting his counterpart leaders to his native town is taken in many cultures as showing guests the highest respect, and Hawai‘i is the world’s most diverse Asia-Pacific community.”

###

The EAST-WEST CENTER is an education and research organization established by the U.S. Congress in 1960 to strengthen relations and understanding among the peoples and nations of Asia, the Pacific, and the United States. The Center contributes to a peaceful, prosperous and just Asia Pacific community by serving as a vigorous hub for cooperative research, education and dialogue on critical issues of common concern to the Asia Pacific region and the United States. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. government, with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, foundations, corporations and the governments of the region.

I Karera I Palabran Mami (The Journey of Our Words): Chamoru poetry reading in Honolulu

Poetry+Reading+Flier

I Karera I Palabran Mami (The Journey of Our Words)

POETS:

Angela T. Hoppe-Cruz (MSW/MA Pacific Isl. Studies Candidate)

Kisha Borja-Ki`cho`cho (MA Pacific Island Studies Candidate).

Both women are Chamoru and were born and raised on the island of Guam.

WHERE: Halau o Haumea, Kamakakuokalani Center for Hawaiian Studies, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2645 Dole Street

WHEN: Friday, November 20, 2009

TIME: 5:00-7:00 p.m.

Angela Cruz is a Chamoru activist and poet in Hawai’i.  She is a practicum student with the American Friends Service Committee working on Micronesian health and justice issues.  She is also involved in the Third Path Women’s movement for reproductive justice.  She writes:

My dear friend Kisha and I will be reading pieces we have collaborated on as well as our individual poetry. Much of our work centers on the impact militarization has had on our home island community -Guam and the Micronesian islands, much of which is manifest in social, economic and environmental injustice. We will be serving up, Chamoru fiesta plates (prepared by the UHM Marianas Club), laughter and great conversation.

Honolulu Advertiser: Pentagon urged to keep Guam better informed on Marine transfer

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091113/BREAKING01/91113045/Pentagon+urged+to+keep+Guam+better+informed+on+Marine+transfer

Friday, November 13, 2009

Pentagon urged to keep Guam better informed on Marine transfer

By JOHN YAUKEY

Gannett Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — Guam’s government needs more timely information from the Defense Department about the planned transfer of 8,000 Marines and their dependents there from Japan so it can better plan for the necessary infrastructure buildup and financing, a government report out Friday said.

“The government of Guam is expected to be largely responsible for funding and constructing … off-base roads and utilities and providing certain public services,” said the report from the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office.

The movement of Marines, which is expected to begin next year with preliminary construction, would also require bringing in additional support troops from the other service branches.

If implemented, the transfer would increase the military population on Guam from 15,000 in 2009 to about 29,000 in 2014, and to more than 39,000 by 2020, according to the GAO report. That would increase the island population of 178,400 by about 14 percent over those years, the report said.

The transfer of the Marines would be a huge economic boon for Guam, if it’s prepared to handle the influx and all the jobs the move will create.

It’s estimated the move will cost $15 billion or more and will generate as many as many as 20,000 construction jobs during peak phases, GAO has determined.

But thus far in the planning process, some of Guam’s government agencies have had a difficult time accurately estimating construction and financing costs.

For example, when Guam officials received updated information on some of the road improvements necessary, the cost estimate dropped from $4.4 billion to $1.5 billion, GAO reported.

The Pentagon responded to the GAO report by saying that it is sharing information as soon as it becomes available and that it has planned several consultant studies that should help Guam officials plan better.

The movement of the Marines from Okinawa, Japan, to Guam is considered a critical part of the nation’s Pacific military and diplomatic strategy.

The Japanese government has been under intense political pressure to get the Marines off Okinawa since 1995, when three U.S. servicemen raped a 12-year-old girl there, straining U.S.-Japan relations. In all, the U.S. has about 50,000 military personnel in Japan.

President Obama discussed the move with Japan’s Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama when they met Friday in Tokyo.

“The United States and Japan have set up a high-level working group that will focus on implementation of the agreement that our two governments have reached with respect to the restructuring of U.S. forces in Okinawa, and we hope to complete this work expeditiously,” Obama said. “Our goal remains the same, and that’s to provide for the defense of Japan with minimal intrusion on the lives of the people who share this space.”