Former diplomat warns against US plan for Guam

Ex-envoy warns against US plan for Guam

Wednesday, 22 July 2009 00:51 by Jude Lizama | Variety News Staff

A FORMER U.S. diplomat turned peace activist advised Guam residents to be wary of the American government’s military buildup plan for the island.

“We need to be looking very carefully at what our federal government does to us,” said Ann Wright, a retired U.S. Army colonel who spoke to a small crowd on the implications of the relocation of 8,000 U.S. Marines from Okinawa to Guam during a presentation held Monday night at the University of Guam.

“While we all want to be safe and secure in the world, sometimes our federal government uses this issue of national security to do things to us that we normally wouldn’t put up with,” she added.

Wright accompanied members of the Code Pink Japan, a peace activist group, who visited Guam to discuss the impact of the military buildup with local activists. The group left Guam yesterday.

“Our delegation is here in solidarity with the people of Guam in terms of the movement of 8,000 marines from Okinawa. The people of Japan, particularly the people on Okinawa, have been working very hard to remove some of the extensive military forces. Now, they seem to be coming to your lovely island,” said Wright, a native of Arkansas.

“The [Okinawans] certainly understand that whenever the U.S. military lands somewhere, it leaves a very large footprint. You all know it very well, because much of your land is already occupied by the U.S. military,” the former U.S. envoy told the audience.

Anti-war

Wright is a former U.S. deputy ambassador who was assigned in Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, Mongolia and Micronesia. She joined the military at the time when the U.S. military was invading Vietnam.

On March 19, 2003, the eve of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, Wright cabled a letter of resignation to Secretary of State Colin Powell, stating that without the authorization of the UN Security Council, the invasion and occupation of a Muslim, Arab, oil-rich country would be a isaster. Since then, she has been writing and speaking out for peace and is now a resident of Honolulu.

“It has been deeply emotional for all of us. Here we are in war again. The United States has started wars in Afghanistan and Iraq,” she said. “When you look at the number of civilians who have been killed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guam, it brings home to us all what we should be working on.”

“The history of the United States is not a peaceful history,” said Wright, who added that the U.S. has, “a history of invading other countries.”

Land grabbing

With regard to the local military buildup, Wright told the audience that, “You have been seeing your own lands being taken from you,” adding that, “The federal government builds without your agreement. They build enormous facilities that have disastrous effects on your environment.”

The retired colonel suggested that people weigh the importance of their own lands, and whether or not it is worth it to lose those lands for an increase in short term values such as trade and business.

“Once the federal government gets its hands into something it never gets it out. With the Obama administration I certainly hope that we will all join together to throw out many of the provisions of the Patriot Act that are really curtailing our own civil liberties,” she said.

Threatened

Japanese parliamentarian and Code Pink member Sumi Fujita said that because of the long military presence and all of the rape cases in Okinawa, “women [there] now feel threatened.”

“All of the military promises to help the Okinawan economy have been a big lie,” Fujita said, through interpreter Hisae Ogawa.

As for the rape issue, Wright said, “This is a failure in leadership that is coming to you, that will allow this to continue.”

“Sometimes being an activist leads to things that you’d never thought you’d be doing,” said Wright.

The former U.S. diplomat also stated that we should all be aware of the “isms” created by policy makers. “Our government has been very good, meaning very bad, in using the ‘isms’ like communism, terrorism, and fascism to frighten and scare the American public so that they can do things that normally we would protest,” she said. “It something we should always be very wary of, when there’s another ‘ism’ coming up.”

Source:

http://guam.mvarietynews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7666:ex-envoy-warns-against-us-plan-for-guam&catid=1:guam-local-news&Itemid=2

Activists occupy Australian military training area to stop war games

MEDIA RELEASE:

7 More Activists Inside Shoalwater Bay Military Training Area: Call for End to War on Afghanistan

Call the following people for further comment on the group’s activities.

Ciaron O’Reilly 0411516434

Sean O’Reilly 0423749946

Margaret Pestorius 0403214422

Professional photos available on request: Margaret 0403214422

Seven anti-war activists entered the Shoalwater Bay military training area in central Queensland during joint US-Australian Talisman Sabre exercises. The seven remain in the area and are presently moving towards the ‘live fire’ areas with the intention of shutting down the exercises. They remain undetected by Australian Defence Force Security and the Qld Police guarding the area.

The activists are:

Yulangi Bardon, 21

Jake Bolton, 27

Jim Dowling, 53

Bryan Law, 55

Emily Nielson, 19

Culley Palmer, 21

Mark Palmer, 51

The group stated:

“US and Australian militaries, training at Talisman Sabre are presently involved in waging an escalated war in northern Pakistan and southern Afghanistan. Most of the victims in this eight year war have been civilians yet the concept of civilians and civilian loss seems to have been completely lost on the military. There aren’t any civilians permitted in the exercises. Civilians are eliminated here as they are eliminated in war.

“As civilians we enter this area in solidarity with all the civilian victims of the US and Australian military. We enter the exercise area with the intention of shutting down the exercises.

“We come from varied backgrounds: Christian and Humanist traditions. We come in common purpose to nonviolently resist these rehearsals for war and the escalating war on the peoples of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

“It is universally acknowledged that lies told by the Australian Parliament and the US government regarding “Weapons of Mass Destruction” [WMD] in Iraq led us to an illegal invasion and disastrous war in that country. Prime Minister Rudd’s recent assertion that Australian troops waging war in Afghanistan decreases the possibility of terrorism at home is also a lie leading us all to further disaster, death and destruction.

“We call upon all sectors of civil society in Australia to take action against such rehearsals for invasion and war as Talisman Sabre. We call upon all sectors of civil society to take action against the escalating war on the peoples of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

“We call upon Air Commodore Meier to make good on his word to the Australian Senate “that if unauthorised personnel are known to be on or near the live fire area, we stop the clock on the exercises until they are found.” [June 4th 09] Despite our attempts to communicate, Thursday’s statement by Brigadier Bob Brown, contrary to this position, exhibits a negligence in relation to human safety that echoes the Australian and US military behaviour in Afghanistan.

Call for further comment on the group’s activities: Martin Luther King House of Nonviolence, Yeppoon:-

Sean O’Reilly 0423749946

Ciaron O’Reilly 0411516434

Margaret Pestorius 0403214422
Professional photos available.

Journalism and Militarization on the ‘tip of the spear’

http://indiancountrynews.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6896&Itemid=64&mosmsg=Thanks+for+your+vote!

War Stories and the Chamorus: journalism and militarization on the tip of the spear.

By Beau Hodai
Special to News From Indian Country 7-09

The weight of occupation and corporate media self-censorship

It was a typical day in the jungle, though more overcast than the constant island diet of endless blue skies and fluffy white clouds; humid– drizzling rain that would materialize from the sticky mist in the air, a breeze stirring through breadfruit and banana leaves.

I was at the family home of Navy Hospital Corpsman Second Class Anthony Carbullido, Jr., whom the Department of Defense had recently listed among the dead to be routed back from Afghanistan to Guam through Dover, Delaware– the victim of an improvised explosive device.

Family and friends of the corpsman were seated in rows of folding chairs under a glowing green fiberglass awning reciting the rosary, “may eternal peace and rest be unto Tony…” a dull, sleepy drone mixed with the static rain.

I was seated in one of the chairs, as were my photographer and his girlfriend. To the side of the house, under a separate awning, large tables were being set with large trays of traditional Chamorro food. A pit-bull puppy pawed at the kitchen door, leaving streaks of red clay as more family members prepared food inside.

I had arrived on Guam less than a month before to work for the island’s largest newspaper, the Gannett-owned Pacific Daily News. My assigned beat was “health and environment,” and while the Carbullido rosary service did not exactly fall under the banner of that beat, it was assigned to me as one of my co-workers, who was usually assigned to rosaries and military funerals, had said he needed a break from covering such functions, as the process of extracting a story from a grieving mother is– at best– draining.

In the darkened living room of the family home I was made to understand this sentiment all too well as I held my little recorder in the mother’s face and asked her how she felt about her son’s death.

Aurora Carbuliido, the sailor’s mother, said that her son’s death was the realization of her fears as a mother of a sailor involved in active duty.

“I’ve seen past pictures and past articles (of troops who have died in combat) and it scared me because my son is over there,” she said.

“This is a hard situation to be in,” his father said. “It’s hard to believe that this is happening to us.” (From: “Family, friends mourn sailor: Acting governor orders flags to half-staff,” Pacific Daily News, August 9, 2008).

It should be noted that the idea that what a person is quoted as saying in a newspaper is accurate is not necessarily accurate; as the photographer haggled with the father about his desire not to be photographed, Mrs. Carbuillido spoke of her son and her fears in the present-tense… “and it scares me because my son is over there.” The idea that they would be shoveling clay into their son’s face sometime in the weeks to come had not yet hit home.

There had been a steady succession of these stories, as Cabullido was the 17th casualty from Guam and the 29th from the northern Marianas region since the outset of Operation Enduring Freedom in 2001.

This succession has given Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands, with a population of under 300,000, the dubious honor of being the region of the United States with the highest number per capita of such casualties.

This is comparable to a city the size of Spokane taking the same blow in the “War on Terror,” but with one large difference: in the insular world of Micronesia, everybody is related in one way or another to everyone else. Few get out. It is because of this that one family’s pain ripples out through the entire community.

A brief history of Guam to bring you to this point:

Guam, the northern-most island of the Marianas Archipelago, known to the Chamorus who occupied it as Guahan, was dubbed the “Island of Thieves” by Ferdinand Magellan when a group of natives attempted to steal one of his ships during his 1521 landing.

In 1668, the Jesuit Padre San Vitores, began colonization of the island for the Spanish crown.

San Vitores was promptly killed in 1672 by a Chamoru chief named Matapang for baptizing his daughter without permission. Matapang was eventually killed in turn.

At the time of Spanish colonization, there were 175,000 Chamorus on Guahan; 100 years into colonization, the population had dwindled to 1,500.

Following the Spanish-American War, Spain ceded the island to U.S. forces in 1898, at which time it served as a small military outpost.

In 1941, Japanese forces invaded the island. Fortunately, U.S. citizens on the island were evacuated prior to the occupation. Unfortunately, all Chamorus were left behind to face three years of forced labor and life in concentration camps around the island. A further 300 Chamorus died during this period. Scars from this period can be found throughout the island in the form of old munitions and tunnels bored though hillsides by Chamoru slave labor for the Japanese.

On July 21, 1944, the U.S. Marines retook the island in the bloody Battle of Guam. Today, Liberation Day warrants a week-long barbeque party along the island’s main drag, Marine Corps Drive, in the capital of Hagatna.

In 1950 the Guam Legislature passed the Organic Act, which laid the foundation for local government as it is now and established Guam as an unincorporated territory of the United States.

Today, Catholicism extends to every facet of life on-island and the Archdiocese of Hagatna holds heavy political sway. The word “Matapang,” which, at the time of San Vitores’ death meant “to be made pure by cleansing,” means “silly” or “foolish” in modern Chamorro, which is a polyglot of English, Spanish and Chamoru.

The word Guahan, which meant “we have”, has long since been replaced by the bastardized “Guam,” which means nothing; and every day the most mournful cacophony I have ever heard rings out of the synth bells atop the Basilica of the Archdiocese of Hagatna, echoing off the cliffs and out into the Philippine Sea like a funereal music box opened for a dead child.

At present, a full third of the island’s land mass of 209 square miles is occupied by either Andersen Air Force base or U.S. Naval Base Guam. Guam is often proudly referred to as the “tip of the spear” for U.S. military operations, as it is the furthest military outpost from the U.S. mainland. Many bumper stickers also proclaim: “Guam: where America’s day begins,” or “SPAM!”

Guam has no exports, virtually no agricultural production (due in large part to military contamination of the land and water-much of this contamination has been attributed to nuclear weapons testing that took place in the Marshall Islands from 1946 to 1962, the effects of which were documented in a 2005 report filed by the National Research Council under the National Academies of Science. Because of this, legislation has been introduced repeatedly-and with little success-by Guam Congressional Delegate Madeleine Z. Bordallo to include the territory in the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act) and no other line of production. Outside of federal subsidies, the main source of revenue on-island is in the trade of Japanese tourist dollars-a revenue stream that has been dwindling in recent years.

This dead-end environment leaves the military as the only viable option for many young people looking to get out.

Following the recitation of the rosary, while waiting to interview Carbullido’s parents, I spoke with several of his friends, his siblings and some of his cousins.

As I was speaking to his teenage brother, one of his cousins joined us.

“What do you think? Still planning on joining up?” the brother asked the cousin, a man in his early twenties clutching a pale blue Bud Lite can.

“Yeah,” he said, raising the can and tilting his head.

“This doesn’t change your mind at all?” asked the brother.

No, the cousin replied; there really wasn’t much other choice for him-no other way out, or up– even if it meant coming back in a box.

Unfortunately for those whose families could not afford private school tuition or cannot afford higher education and who are products of the Guam Public School System, even the military option appears to be closing on them.

A recruiter for the Guam Army National Guard told me in an interview at the time that, while he has seen an increase in interest in military service in the region, increasing numbers of young people educated on the island have been unable to pass the Armed Forces Vocational Aptitude Test.

GPSS is, by far, the GovGuam line agency beset by the most demons-which is considerable, given that GovGuam could be likened to a boondoggle of contemptuous, incompetent snakes, each trying to bight the other’s head off in the perennial battle over the territory’s small annual budget.

Last year the office of the Guam Attorney General closed down several of the system’s schools, citing exposure of students to raw sewage, asbestos and fire hazards.

All but one of the schools have been reopened to date, but the department has still been unable to fill its staffing needs, students still continue to perform well below national standards and at a 2008 budget hearing a GPSS employee told the Guam Legislature that teachers in the system actually had a higher absenteeism rate than students.

But, even if enlistment is not an option, many still see the Department of Defense as Guam’s Savior.

In 2006, the DoD announced plans to relocate some 5,000 Marines and their dependents from the Japanese prefecture of Okinawa to a new to-be-built base on Guam.

The estimated impact of the shift, or “military buildup,” as it is commonly referred to, when considering the number of workers to fill jobs created by the need to expand both civilian and military infrastructure, translates to at least a twenty percent population boom over the course of a few years, set to begin (tentatively) in 2010. Some believe that a twenty percent population increase is a conservative estimate and set the number much higher.

Many members of the Guam business community and government are bedazzled by what they anticipate to be a cornucopia of new possibilities in profit and employment offered through the expansion.

Many of these dazzled individuals are the same ones who advertize in, and thereby underwrite, the island’s news media, chief of which is the same Gannett-owned Pacific Daily News that I covered the Carbullido rosary for.

When my editor changed Aurora Carbullido’s quote, he also buried it at the back of the article. He had placed canned statements from the island’s acting governor and congressional representative before not just statements from the grieving mother, but of all the corpsman’s family members.

“We extend our sympathies and prayers to all his family, friends and loved ones,” said Guam Delegate Madeleine Bordallo…

“Anthony will rest in the hearts and minds of a grateful people humbled by his ultimate sacrifice,” said Acting Governor Mike Cruz in a statement yesterday. “I have ordered all government… agencies to fly flags at half-staff in honor of…”

This same editor had lectured me on previous occasions about putting the statements of “real people” above whatever hollow canned crap you may get from the desk of a politician. This rule apparently did not apply to cases involving a military death.

Cases when the rule did apply, by PDN/Gannett standards, were when you’d be handed a press release on some banal item, such as “Healthy Snack Food Month,” or “Infant Automobile Safety Awareness Month,” from some ad hoc task force. You’d then be given your orders to go over to the shopping center down the block, get three “reactions” from “real people,” then march back to the newsroom and churn out six to eight inches of copy by combining all or parts of the press release with the quotes.

That is Gannett journalism: the best in fast food, bulleted coverage-as pioneered by U.S.A Today.

My theory then, as this editor in the most gently condescending tones, explained the role of “real people” to me, is the same as it is now in hindsight; Aurora Carbullido’s reaction was too real. It was the visceral reaction of a shocked mind to an inconceivable pain. And this pain was brought about by involvement with the Department of Defense, the same DoD that so many underwriters looked on as a messiah that would finally put them on the map. This is why the quote of a grieving mother was altered and buried.
The statement that journalism at such a paper is only an incidental byproduct that suffers from this ad-driven editorial policy could be considered libelous if-for one, it was not true-or if it was not the Gannett modus operandi by definition:

The company was started by Frank Ernest Gannett, who in 1906 began buying small newspapers in New York state…

… These newspapers were usually the only ones published in their city and so could be run very profitably. The company’s growth was further spurred by the attention it paid to advertising and circulation and by its tight control of costs…

…This pattern of buying up all the newspapers in an area, slashing subscription rates to levels which (according to critics) only a national conglomerate could sustain, and then raising advertising rates once control over the local market had been secured brought Gannett severe criticism as well as lawsuits. Smaller community and privately owned newspapers have charged the media giant with predatory practices and violations of antitrust laws. Not helping Gannett’s image was the frank admission of brash business tactics by former Gannett chairman Allen Neuharth in his autobiography, Confessions of an S.O.B. (1989). (From, “Gannett Co., Inc.” as defined by Encyclopedia Britannica, 2009).

So it should have been no surprise when the PDN refused to cover any story outlining the long shadow of rape and assault allegations that accompanied the history of Marines stationed in Okinawa and whose arrival was being staged on Guam.

The same co-worker who had declined to cover the rosary and myself had been pressing our editors to do a story on this history, as there had been virtually no coverage of it in Guam media to that point.

Nothing ever came of it; each day we logged on to the program that contained the daily budget and found that the item had either been pushed back or removed entirely.

Eventually, unable to stomach their editorial policy any longer, I jumped ship and went to work for the PDN’s only competition, the Marianas Variety.

One day my old co-worker said he had given up trying to get the story into the PDN following an especially heated exchange between himself and the managing editor on the subject of the Okinawa Marines story in which he said the editor had indignantly exclaimed, “I have friends and family in the military!”

Military censorship

I had been holding the story up to that point out of respect for my friend, but on hearing that he had given up trying to run it in the PDN, I decided to run with it.

I set out to get some information on the allegations from the Navy and the Joint Guam Program Office, which had been set up by the DoD to act as a civilian-military liaison to pave the way for the Marines. It seemed that once the Navy had figured out I was going to write a critical article, my phone calls and emails went unanswered.

The Variety finally ran an article-despite lack of cooperation on the part of the Navy-in November highlighting the grave concerns of many Guam senators over the violent history of the Marines in Okinawa.

At about that time the Navy’s public information officer met with the Variety’s general operations manager, saying that I was harassing him and that he thought I didn’t know what I was talking about. He said the Navy did not keep any records of allegations against its service members and suspected that I had not done my research.

Given the Navy’s reticence on the issue, I cited numbers directly from the Okinawa prefecture government website, as well as data compiled by Japanese activist groups:

“A report filed this year by an activist group, Okinawa Women Act Against Military Violence, documented over 400 alleged cases of rape, abduction, assault, murder and other forms of abuse committed by U.S. forces in Japan from the period of their post-war occupation to the present.”(“Concerns raised over Okinawa incidents: part 1” Marianas Variety, October 30, 2008)

“(T)here have been more than 5,076 cases of crime caused by the SOFA (Service of Forces Agreement) status people since the reversion of Okinawa to mainland Japan (1972). This number includes 531 cases of brutal crimes and 955 cases of assaults. Thus, there is fear amongst the people of Okinawa as to whether or not security for their daily lives can be maintained and whether their property can be preserved.”(From “Concerns raised over Okinawa incidents: part 2,” Marianas Variety, November 7, 2008-as quoted directly from the website of the government of the Okinawa Prefecture.)

In December, following the story on the Okinawa Marines, I wrote an article for the Variety entitled “DoD’s ‘mystery’ project puzzles Guam officials,” which examined a tip I had received that JGPO was looking to convert about 650 acres currently belonging to the Chamorro Land Trust Commission and 250 acres belonging to the Ancestral Lands Commission-which was currently occupied by Guam International Raceway– into a firing range.

On January 15, Variety reporter and editor, Mar-Vic Cagurangan, wrote a follow-up article, based on a written statement from JGPO Operations Director, Lt. Col. Rudy Kube, confirming the suspicions.

On April 28, the Variety received payment from JGPO for their role as a ‘watchdog’ paper when Variety reporters were barred from attending the “Guam Industry Forum III,” while all other media outlets on-island were granted access.

Variety reporter, Jennifer Naylor Gesick, wrote:

Onsite industry forum personnel notified the reporting staff that the ban was on a “federal level” and was issued as a “government order” from U.S. Marine Corp Capt. Neil Ruggiero with the Joint Guam Project Office…”
The ban was in effect in all venues, as confirmed by Variety reporters in the field. Press passes were printed for every media company on island, except for the Variety…

… Ruggiero argued that Variety could have attended the event as a business if the publishers had registered with the forum.

“Marianas Variety was given the same opportunity as anyone else, they just chose not to be paying registrants, [Pacific Daily News] chose to pay and they were allowed access,” he said…

…However, any media covering the event was allowed in free.

In response to claims of a violation of the freedom of the press in restricting access to the forum, Ruggiero responded that “the press who only stays one session is allowed in free.” That accommodation was not extended to the Variety.

Ruggiero also said that a Variety columnist was given access to represent the paper.

Variety columnist Jayne Flores confirmed that she was given a pass, but Ruggiero later said, “I told her she could not come as Marianas Variety or write any news for them.”

(From “Variety banned by JGPO,” Marianas Variety, April 29, 2009)

Gesick went on to quote Ruggiero, who is the public information officer for JGPO, as saying that the ban on Variety reporters was in effect because he felt part of Kube’s statement had been published out of context, although he did not challenge the veracity of the story.

Despite this lack of cooperation with media outlets willing to report any story critical of the DoD’s plans for the island, events in which the public have been able to ask questions of those involved with the proposed buildup or voice their concerns have drawn large crowds.

The large turnout at such forums suggests that those who are concerned for their island’s future in light of such weighty developments are not marginal or fringe groups as the dismissive attitudes of the DoD and the PDN would suggest.

At a forum held in November at the University of Guam, panelists from both the Civilian-Military Task Force, which works under the auspices of the Office of the Governor with JGPO, as well as members of the community working toward Guam’s self-determination stated both their progress and concerns with the buildup.

Panelist Mike Bevacqua of Famoksaiyan said every resident of Guam-regardless of their position on the buildup-needs to realize that the buildup will affect them personally. He encouraged residents to take a more proactive role in the course of their and Guam’s future.

“It is taking place because we are America, and it’s taking place because we’re not. It is not only something that takes place because of our geographic position, but our colonial status as well…”

“…It is also taking place because we are one of the few American communities where a unilateral announcement by the DOD that it intends to drastically affect life in your community and cause a population increase of 74 percent is met with excitement, celebration and a frightening lack of questioning…”

“…and this military buildup is predicated on the fact that you live in a colony and you can be treated as an object for the subject of the United States, as a weapon of the warrior of the United States military. This is the United States military sharpening the tip of its spear.”

(“Military buildup forum draws huge crowd,” Marianas Variety, November 20, 2008)

Camp Lejeune male breast cancer epidemic

This article reveals a shocking epidemic of male breast cancer among veterans and other men connected to Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base.  The main culprits suspected are Trichloroethylene (TCE) and Perchloroethylene (PCE) in the base drinking water.   These are the same contaminants found in ‘Aiea and Wahiawa groundwater from military bases.   The article mentions a website by survivors of Camp Lejeune contamination: http://tftptf.com/5801.html.  It contains lots of good information.

>><<

http://www.tampabay.com/news/military/veterans/article1015699.ece

More vets report cancer

By William R. Levesque, Times Staff Writer

Published Friday, July 3, 2009

Scientists studying drinking water contamination at Camp Lejeune were startled when 11 men with breast cancer and ties to the North Carolina base were identified over the last two years.

Six more have been found in one week.

Five additional men with breast cancer and a sixth who had a double mastectomy after doctors found precancerous tumors contacted the St. Petersburg Times last week after reading a story about the 11 men with the rare disease.

“This male breast cancer cluster is a smoking gun,” breast cancer survivor Mike Partain said on Friday. “You just can’t ignore it. You don’t need science to tell you something is wrong. It’s common sense. It begs to be studied.”

Partain, 41, of Tallahassee, was born at the Marine Corps base and diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007. He has worked for two years to find other men with breast cancer who lived at Camp Lejeune.

He found the first nine men before the Times profiled his search in a story on June 28, a story that noted the newspaper had found another man not on Partain’s list.

In the days after that story, other male breast cancer survivors called or e-mailed the Times.

Scientists studying what some call the worst public-drinking water contamination in the nation’s history said the numbers are unsettling.

“My gut tells me this is unusual and needs to be looked into,” said Richard Clapp, a Boston University epidemiologist who has studied Camp Lejeune water. “I’m sure there are still more out there in other states.”

Camp Lejeune’s drinking water was contaminated for 30 years ending in 1987 with high levels of industrial degreasers called trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE). Clapp said both have been linked to other suspicious male breast cancer clusters elsewhere.

The chemicals were dumped there by the Marine Corps and a private dry-cleaning business, according to investigators.

Congress, which has dubbed ill Marines “poisoned patriots,” ordered the Marines last year to notify those who might have been exposed. Some estimates put the number at up to 1 million people.

Many Marines, however, are still unaware.

One who didn’t have a clue about the contamination is South Florida resident Jim Morris.

Morris said he was astonished when he was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2000 at the age of 54. His family had no history of breast cancer. He didn’t realize men could get the disease.

Few do.

Male breast cancer is exceedingly rare. Just 1,900 men are expected to be diagnosed with breast cancer this year compared with nearly 200,000 women, the American Cancer Society says.

A man has a 1-in-1,000 lifetime chance of getting the disease.

Men who get it are often over 70, though it is rare even in older males. Of the 17 men identified by Partain and the Times, just three are over 70 – the youngest was Partain at 39 – and many have no family history of breast cancer, male or female, according to interviews.

Morris said his sister lives in Pasco County and saw the Times article about Partain. She immediately called her brother.

“It was almost a relief to find out my cancer actually came from somewhere,” said Morris, who has worked as a surveyor. “I’m not just some idiot who got breast cancer for no reason. I never expected to find out. It was going to be one of those lifetime puzzles you never figure out.”

Scientists, however, are careful to say that it is extremely difficult to prove a link between pollution and a disease. The Marine Corps declined to comment for this story.

Two federal studies are expected to be completed in coming years that will look at the incidence of all disease among those who lived at Camp Lejeune. The stakes are enormous, with potentially billions of dollars in health claims by more than 1,500 people who say the water made them ill.

University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center epidemiologist Devra Davis also is preparing a case report on the breast cancer cluster.

Partain is among those who believe Camp Lejeune’s water may have caused a variety of cancers and other ailments. A growing community of Camp Lejeune veterans, including many who say they are ill, have connected on the Web, many at a popular Internet site called tftptf.com.

More than 10,000 Floridians with Lejeune ties have signed up for a health survey, the most from any state except North Carolina.

Joe Moser, 69, of Riverview was diagnosed with breast and thyroid cancer in February 2008. He was stationed at Camp Lejeune from 1957 to 1960. He said he didn’t know about water problems at the base and was stunned to read about the breast cancer link.

“This is too weird,” Moser said. “All these men with breast cancer? Come on. There’s got to be a lot more of us out there. God, so many of the guys I served with were from Trenton or Philadelphia, all over the place. Who knows if they’re sick, too.”

William R. Levesque can be reached at levesque@sptimes.com or (813) 269-5306.

How to Deal with America’s Empire of Bases

Published on Thursday, July 2, 2009 by TomDispatch.com

How to Deal with America’s Empire of Bases

A Modest Proposal for Garrisoned Lands

by Chalmers Johnson

The U.S. Empire of Bases — at $102 billion a year already the world’s costliest military enterprise — just got a good deal more expensive. As a start, on May 27th, we learned that the State Department will build a new “embassy” in Islamabad, Pakistan, which at $736 million will be the second priciest ever constructed, only $4 million less, if cost overruns don’t occur, than the Vatican-City-sized one the Bush administration put up in Baghdad. The State Department was also reportedly planning to buy the five-star Pearl Continental Hotel (complete with pool) in Peshawar, near the border with Afghanistan, to use as a consulate and living quarters for its staff there.

Unfortunately for such plans, on June 9th Pakistani militants rammed a truck filled with explosives into the hotel, killing 18 occupants, wounding at least 55, and collapsing one entire wing of the structure. There has been no news since about whether the State Department is still going ahead with the purchase.
Whatever the costs turn out to be, they will not be included in our already bloated military budget, even though none of these structures is designed to be a true embassy — a place, that is, where local people come for visas and American officials represent the commercial and diplomatic interests of their country. Instead these so-called embassies will actually be walled compounds, akin to medieval fortresses, where American spies, soldiers, intelligence officials, and diplomats try to keep an eye on hostile populations in a region at war. One can predict with certainty that they will house a large contingent of Marines and include roof-top helicopter pads for quick get-aways.

While it may be comforting for State Department employees working in dangerous places to know that they have some physical protection, it must also be obvious to them, as well as the people in the countries where they serve, that they will now be visibly part of an in-your-face American imperial presence. We shouldn’t be surprised when militants attacking the U.S. find one of our base-like embassies, however heavily guarded, an easier target than a large military base.

And what is being done about those military bases anyway — now close to 800 of them dotted across the globe in other people’s countries? Even as Congress and the Obama administration wrangle over the cost of bank bailouts, a new health plan, pollution controls, and other much needed domestic expenditures, no one suggests that closing some of these unpopular, expensive imperial enclaves might be a good way to save some money.

Instead, they are evidently about to become even more expensive. On June 23rd, we learned that Kyrgyzstan, the former Central Asian Soviet Republic which, back in February 2009, announced that it was going to kick the U.S. military out of Manas Air Base (used since 2001 as a staging area for the Afghan War), has been persuaded to let us stay. But here’s the catch: In return for doing us that favor, the annual rent Washington pays for use of the base will more than triple from $17.4 million to $60 million, with millions more to go into promised improvements in airport facilities and other financial sweeteners. All this because the Obama administration, having committed itself to a widening war in the region, is convinced it needs this base to store and trans-ship supplies to Afghanistan.

I suspect this development will not go unnoticed in other countries where Americans are also unpopular occupiers. For example, the Ecuadorians have told us to leave Manta Air Base by this November. Of course, they have their pride to consider, not to speak of the fact that they don’t like American soldiers mucking about in Colombia and Peru. Nonetheless, they could probably use a spot more money.

And what about the Japanese who, for more than 57 years, have been paying big bucks to host American bases on their soil? Recently, they reached a deal with Washington to move some American Marines from bases on Okinawa to the U.S. territory of Guam. In the process, however, they were forced to shell out not only for the cost of the Marines’ removal, but also to build new facilities on Guam for their arrival. Is it possible that they will now take a cue from the government of Kyrgyzstan and just tell the Americans to get out and pay for it themselves? Or might they at least stop funding the same American military personnel who regularly rape Japanese women (at the rate of about two per month) and make life miserable for whoever lives near the 38 U.S. bases on Okinawa. This is certainly what the Okinawans have been hoping and praying for ever since we arrived in 1945.

In fact, I have a suggestion for other countries that are getting a bit weary of the American military presence on their soil: cash in now, before it’s too late. Either up the ante or tell the Americans to go home. I encourage this behavior because I’m convinced that the U.S. Empire of Bases will soon enough bankrupt our country, and so — on the analogy of a financial bubble or a pyramid scheme — if you’re an investor, it’s better to get your money out while you still can.

This is, of course, something that has occurred to the Chinese and other financiers of the American national debt. Only they’re cashing in quietly and slowly in order not to tank the dollar while they’re still holding onto such a bundle of them. Make no mistake, though: whether we’re being bled rapidly or slowly, we are bleeding; and hanging onto our military empire and all the bases that go with it will ultimately spell the end of the United States as we know it.

Count on this, future generations of Americans traveling abroad decades from now won’t find the landscape dotted with near-billion-dollar “embassies.”

© 2009 TomDispatch.com

Chalmers Johnson is the author of three linked books on the crises of American imperialism and militarism. They are Blowback (2000), The Sorrows of Empire (2004), and Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic (Metropolitan Books, 2006). All are available in paperback from Metropolitan Books. A retired professor of international relations from the University of California (Berkeley and San Diego campuses) and the author of some seventeen books primarily on the politics and economics of East Asia, Johnson is president of the Japan Policy Research Institute. To listen to a TomDispatch audio interview with Johnson on the Pentagon’s potential economic death spiral, click here.

Superferry ships awarded to construction lender

Superferry ships awarded to construction lender

Remaining creditors will have to sue J.F. Lehman & Co. to recover any monies owed

By Bloomberg News

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Jul 02, 2009

Hawaii Superferry Inc. can abandon its ships to lenders owed $158.8 million for their construction, a federal judge ruled.

Bankruptcy Judge Peter Walsh’s decision yesterday means the vessels, relocated from Hawaii to a shipyard in Mobile, Ala., may be taken over by the federal agency that helped fund the ships’ construction.

“We’re not going to be returning back to the state of Hawaii now that the estate has abandoned the ships,” Leon Barson, a Hawaii Superferry attorney, told Walsh during a hearing in Wilmington, Del., where the Hawaii Superferry filed for bankruptcy on May 30.

Hawaii Superferry and its parent, HSF Holdings Inc., have only about $1.2 million in cash and a single ferry engine to use to pay creditors, company officials said in court. That means creditors may be forced to file lawsuits against the private-equity firm that controlled Hawaii Superferry to recover anything, creditor attorney Craig Wolfe told Walsh.

Hawaii Superferry is controlled by J.F. Lehman & Co., which was founded by former Secretary of the Navy John F. Lehman, said Alex Harman, a partner at the firm.

J.F. Lehman specializes in military and maritime markets, Harman said in court. The private-equity firm lost its entire $85 million investment in Hawaii Superferry, Harman said.

Walsh also ruled that the main part of the bankruptcy case will stay in Delaware. Only claims filed by the state of Hawaii related to its contract with the ferry company will be transferred to U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Honolulu, Walsh said.

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration was owed more than $135.7 million by Hawaii Superferry because of loan guarantees it made to help build the ships. Agency officials said yesterday in court they may foreclose on the vessels.

The ships’ builder, Austal USA LLC, is owed $23 million. The vessels can each carry 866 passengers and 282 cars, according to court records.

Harman said that the company tried unsuccessfully to lease the ships to ferry operators in the Caribbean and Europe. The ships, which require about $20,000 a day to operate not including crew costs, may wind up being used by the U.S. military, Harman said.

The company has no plans to try to regain control of the ships, Harman told Walsh.

Hawaii Superferry was formed in 2002 to provide high-speed ferry service among Oahu, Maui, Hawaii and Kauai.

A law passed by the Hawaii Legislature on Oct. 31, 2007, was designed to allow the company to operate after a series of successful state court legal challenges, Hawaii Superferry said in a court filing.

Eventually that law was struck down by the Hawaii Supreme Court, which ruled that the law was intended specifically to benefit a particular company, in violation of the state constitution.

The company spent as much as $20 million fighting in court to keep the operation open, including the costs of keeping the ships ready and crews on the payroll while it waited for the state Supreme Court to rule, Harman said.

Hawaii Superferry Inc. can abandon its ships to lenders owed $158.8 million for their construction, a federal judge ruled.

Bankruptcy Judge Peter Walsh’s decision yesterday means the vessels, relocated from Hawaii to a shipyard in Mobile, Ala., may be taken over by the federal agency that helped fund the ships’ construction.

“We’re not going to be returning back to the state of Hawaii now that the estate has abandoned the ships,” Leon Barson, a Hawaii Superferry attorney, told Walsh during a hearing in Wilmington, Del., where the Hawaii Superferry filed for bankruptcy on May 30.

Hawaii Superferry and its parent, HSF Holdings Inc., have only about $1.2 million in cash and a single ferry engine to use to pay creditors, company officials said in court. That means creditors may be forced to file lawsuits against the private-equity firm that controlled Hawaii Superferry to recover anything, creditor attorney Craig Wolfe told Walsh.

Hawaii Superferry is controlled by J.F. Lehman & Co., which was founded by former Secretary of the Navy John F. Lehman, said Alex Harman, a partner at the firm.

J.F. Lehman specializes in military and maritime markets, Harman said in court. The private-equity firm lost its entire $85 million investment in Hawaii Superferry, Harman said.

Walsh also ruled that the main part of the bankruptcy case will stay in Delaware. Only claims filed by the state of Hawaii related to its contract with the ferry company will be transferred to U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Honolulu, Walsh said.

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration was owed more than $135.7 million by Hawaii Superferry because of loan guarantees it made to help build the ships. Agency officials said yesterday in court they may foreclose on the vessels.

The ships’ builder, Austal USA LLC, is owed $23 million. The vessels can each carry 866 passengers and 282 cars, according to court records.

Harman said that the company tried unsuccessfully to lease the ships to ferry operators in the Caribbean and Europe. The ships, which require about $20,000 a day to operate not including crew costs, may wind up being used by the U.S. military, Harman said.

The company has no plans to try to regain control of the ships, Harman told Walsh.

Hawaii Superferry was formed in 2002 to provide high-speed ferry service among Oahu, Maui, Hawaii and Kauai.

A law passed by the Hawaii Legislature on Oct. 31, 2007, was designed to allow the company to operate after a series of successful state court legal challenges, Hawaii Superferry said in a court filing.

Eventually that law was struck down by the Hawaii Supreme Court, which ruled that the law was intended specifically to benefit a particular company, in violation of the state constitution.

The company spent as much as $20 million fighting in court to keep the operation open, including the costs of keeping the ships ready and crews on the payroll while it waited for the state Supreme Court to rule, Harman said.

Source: http://www.starbulletin.com/business/20090702_Superferry_ships_awarded_to_construction_lender.html

Superferry bankruptcy case to remain in Delaware

Updated at 1:36 p.m., Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Bulk of Superferry bankruptcy case will remain on Mainland, judge rules

Bloomberg News

WILMINGTON, Del. – A bankruptcy judge today ruled that Hawaii Superferry can abandon its two catamarans to lenders owed $158.8 million for their construction and that the bulk of the bankruptcy case will remain in Delaware.

The decision by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Peter Walsh means the vessels, relocated from Hawaii to a shipyard in Mobile, Ala., may be taken over by the federal agency that helped fund the ships’ construction.

“We’re not going to be returning back to the state of Hawaii now that the estate has abandoned the ships,” company attorney Leon Barson told Walsh today during a hearing in Wilmington, Del., where Hawaii Superferry filed for bankruptcy on May 30.

Walsh also ruled that the main part of the bankruptcy case would stay in Delaware. Only claims filed by the state of Hawaii related to its contract with Superferry will be transferred to the federal bankruptcy court in Hawaii, Walsh said.

The state said in its change-of-venue motion that Hawaii Superferry has no connection with Delaware aside from being incorporated there. All of the operations were in Hawaii, the state said.

Having the case nearly 5,000 thousand miles and six time zones away makes it difficult to protect the state’s interest in regulating the use of Hawaii’s waters and ports, the state’s papers said.

Hawaii Superferry had support from creditors in opposing moving the case to Honolulu.

Hawaii Superferry Inc. pointed out that more than half the unsecured creditors aren’t in Hawaii while the largest secured creditor, Guggenheim Corporate Funding LLC, wanted the case to remain in Delaware.

The Maritime Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation also wanted the case to stay where it is, and so did the official creditors’ committee.

The committee, with one of its three members from Hawaii, pointed out that the company isn’t operating in the state and that the two catamarans aren’t there either.

Honolulu-based Hawaii Superferry was shut down in March by a decision from the Hawaii Supreme Court. The company was operating one ferry since August 2007. The second was delivered in April.

The company said in its Chapter 11 petition that its assets and debt both exceed $100 million. Debt includes $136 million in first-mortgage bonds secured by the ferries. Another $23 million in second-priority ship mortgages are owing to shipbuilder Austal Ships. Guggenheim is owed $51.7 million on notes where the company says there is a $7.5 million fund for paying interest.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090701/BREAKING01/90701023/Bulk+of+Superferry+bankruptcy+case+will+remain+on+Mainland++judge+rules

Killed in action

Killed in action

Adrienne LaFrance
Jul 1, 2009

A suicide epidemic has soldiers killing themselves in record high numbers. Some months this year saw more American soldiers die by suicide than in combat. Hawaii has sent a vast number of troops to Iraq-more, at times, than any other state. Now, with a flood of soldiers now returning from Iraq, the ramped-up U.S. presence in Afghanistan and some local units preparing for their fourth and fifth deployments, Honolulu Weekly examines the toll that war is taking on our soldiers and their families, and what the agencies designed to serve them are doing about it.

The letter began, “Hey babe, if you get this, I’m no longer around.” It came in a package from Iraq, along with a miniature American flag, stained with blood and tucked into the pages of a book. Jeffrey Lucey, a then-22-year-old lance corporal in the Marine Corps Reserve, said he had found it in the hands of a four-year-old Iraqi boy who was lying dead in the street. He sent it, along with the letter, to his girlfriend Julie back in Massachusetts before he died.

But Lucey was still alive when she received it. It wasn’t until later, nearly 6,000 miles away from Baghdad, that the war finally killed him.

“We still have the video of his return,” said Jeff’s father, Kevin Lucey. “He was smiling, a little bit thinner, but so happy to be back.”

Five years ago-and nearly a year after Jeff’s homecoming-his father found him hanging from the basement rafters of their home in Belchertown, Mass., a garden hose double looped around his neck.

In the years since Jeff’s suicide, concern about the rising number of suicides across all branches of the military continues to grow. In the Army alone, including cases still being investigated, the Pentagon finds that 117 active duty and reserve soldiers killed themselves from January through May. That’s just 11 fewer suicides than the at least 128 confirmed in all of 2008-already a three-decade high.

“Army leadership is very concerned about the increased suicide rate we’ve seen within the Army the last four or five years,” said Col. C.J. Diebold, chief of psychiatry at Tripler Army Medical Center and psychiatry consultant to the surgeon general. “The geographic separation, the inherent dangers of the combat zone and we now have soldiers in their fourth and fifth deployment. If you look just at the history of the 25th [Infantry Division] in the past five years, they’re now getting through their second full deployment and ramping up toward their third. That’s certainly stressful.”

Already there have been months this year in which more soldiers killed themselves than were killed in combat. And as the National Institute of Mental Health and the Army scramble to jump-start a collaborative five-year $50 million study aimed at better understanding and preventing military suicide, local military entities, as well as agencies devoted to caring for veterans, are implementing new programs and promoting outreach in an effort to save the lives of service members across the Islands.

On the homefront

Here in Hawaii, where the military makes up nearly 10 percent of the population-that’s more than any other state-the threat of suicide looms large. An employee at Honolulu’s Department of the Medical Examiner who asked not to be named says that in addition to noticing a significant increase in military suicides on a local level, she suspects that more than half of those who kill themselves on Oahu are military servicemen and servicewomen.

In an e-mail obtained by the Weekly, Tripler Army Medical Center public affairs officer Les Ozawa wrote to Lt. Col. George Wright, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon, that there have been two “recent” Army suicides in Hawaii. Ozawa says an Army directive prevents discussion or confirmation of any specific cases.

And while the Army has set an example for other branches of the military with relative transparency on the issue, the extent to which information is safeguarded, undisclosed or otherwise convoluted-the Department of Veterans Affairs tracks the number of suicides among Hawaii veterans as part of a larger group that includes cases throughout California-creates startling distance from the reality of what’s actually happening.

“There’s no doubt that there’s an agenda there,” said Kevin Lucey. “You don’t want to really have the complete knowledge because if you do, aren’t you going to have to do something about it?”

Losing the battle

The spike in suicide among enlisted soldiers also raises concerns about an already overburdened U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs system. With estimates that as many as one-third of soldiers return from Iraq and Afghanistan with diagnosable post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD (not to mention the mental health needs of countless veterans of previous conflicts), there simply aren’t enough resources to get every solider the help he or she needs in the time that he or she needs it. Hawaii has its own set of regionally-specific challenges.

“What’s different about our community is that we’re spread out,” said Susan Bass, suicide prevention coordinator at the Honolulu Department of Veterans Affairs. “We cover Guam, we cover American Samoa, all of the neighbor islands, even sometimes the Philippines. Some of these places don’t have the community resources for outreach. Some are in rural places.”

In addition to covering a wide region, the local VA has fewer amenities for its large military population than its counterparts in other areas of the country.

“We don’t have a VA hospital,” said Michael Kestner, a suicide prevention case manager at the VA in Honolulu. “Many times we have to rely on Tripler or other hospitals in the community, so it’s a little more difficult for us to access services. We try to work around those difficulties. The police department has occasionally done health and welfare checks on our veterans.”

Tripler Army Medical Center is home to one of the National Center for PTSD’s seven sites across the country, but many active duty soldiers and veterans have mental health needs that fall outside of the realm of PTSD. Just last year, Tripler paid $800,000 to settle a lawsuit that charged it failed to adequately treat a bi-polar veteran who jumped to his death from the hospital roof after twice pleading for help and expressing suicidal ideations in the Tripler emergency department.

Nationwide Veterans Affairs centers, too, have faced criticism repeatedly in the years since it was revealed that the Army’s flagship medical center, Walter Reed, was deteriorating and failing to meet its patients’ needs. A five-month CBS News investigation in 2007 found that across the 45 states for which records could be obtained, there were 120 veterans who killed themselves per week, which amounts to at least 6,256 suicides in 2005 alone.

On the floor of the U.S. Senate last September, Chair of the Veterans’ Affairs Committee U.S. Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) addressed the rising suicide rate among veterans.

“Suicide among Iraq and Afghanistan-era veterans is at an all-time high,” said Akaka. “The number of veterans found to have service-connected PTSD is not just rising, it is rising several times faster than service-connected disabilities overall…Veterans are committing suicide at a higher rate than their civilian counterparts. A recent RAND study found that nearly three out of four veterans in need of mental health care receive inadequate care or no care at all.”

Warning signs

In the six months leading up to his death, the Luceys knew that Jeff was in desperate need of help. But for months before that, Jeff’s family thought his behavior was just part of the readjustment period they’d been told to accept. For example, Kevin says his son refused to go outside on a trip to the beach with his girlfriend.

“He always loved the ocean, but he said to her he had seen enough sand to last him a lifetime,” said Kevin. “These comments, we knew something was going on, but we thought it was just minor readjustment.”

By the following winter, it became clear that something was seriously wrong. Jeff was drinking more and more, bowing out of family events like the Luceys traditional Christmas dinner and lashing out, calling himself a “murderer.”

“Jeff would start talking and his voice would become very monotone and he would get that thousand-mile gaze, like he wasn’t talking to anyone,” Kevin said. “He told his mother about how he had to throw grenades up on the roof of a building because there were snipers. He spoke about how the rules of engagement had been called off and he saw some elderly people get killed. And then he spoke about shooting two unarmed Iraqi soldiers. Now the Marines did an investigation and said they never found anything to support this, but I believe him. He said he was ordered to shoot them and as he was holding up his gun, it was shaking. He looked into the kid’s eyes and started wondering if this kid was there like he was-maybe he didn’t want to be there either-and whether he was somebody’s father or brother or son. He described the sound of the shooting and that burned its way into Jeff’s heart.”

Jeff was also throwing up every morning, which the Luceys later learned to be an indication of PTSD, and suffered frightening hallucinations.

“While he was in Iraq, he wrote about the camel spiders-these big five-inch spiders that he could hear climbing on the tents,” said Kevin Lucey. “Even as a little boy, Jeff was terrified of spiders and he would call for his mother. So when he got home from Iraq, he could hear the camel spiders in his room and he would look for them with a flashlight. Jeff would also hear voices. He never said what they were saying or if they were even in English. He was tremendously scared to go to sleep.”

Too little, too late

“I don’t know why I am going fucking crazy,” Kevin Lucey remembers his son saying in the last weeks of his life. Jeff had applied for a job with the Massachusetts State Police and was afraid that seeking mental health services would disqualify him from the applicant pool.

It was Memorial Day weekend and Jeff had been drinking heavily the day he finally agreed to go to the VA. Frustrated, he punched a hole in the wall before leaving the house, and when he got to the VA, he didn’t want to stay. A breathalyzer recorded his blood-alcohol level at .328 some four hours after his last drink.

“There was this male nurse there and as it turned out, he was also in the Marine Corps,” remembered Kevin Lucey. “That made a huge difference. Jeff immediately started cooperating. We may have strong feelings about the VA system but there are some very good people who work there. This nurse stayed with Jeff the entire evening.”

A week before his death, Jeff agreed to go to the VA a second time.

“Jeff was going to try to get into a PTSD unit but the VA hospital said he was going to have to be sober for three to six months, which infuriated me,” said Kevin Lucey. “On the way back home, though, he was talking. He hadn’t been drinking the past four nights. He really felt there was hope.”

But days later, Jeff came unglued again. The night after father’s day, he flew into a rage. After two calls for help to the VA, Jeff finally relaxed.

“He calmed down and we talked, watched the Red Sox, and Jeff came over to me and said, ‘Dad, can I sit in your lap?’ And we rocked there for 45 minutes in total silence. I was scratching the back of his neck. He loved steak and we talked about going to a steakhouse, we planned it for the next night.”

But the next day, Jeff killed himself. Kevin Lucey found him hanging above a stack of photographs-most of them of his family, and one of himself wearing his Marines uniform.

“I remember screaming and running over to him and putting my knees underneath him to get him down,” said Kevin Lucey. “That was the last time he would be in my lap.”

Erasing the stigma

Kevin Lucey said it’s now obvious to him that his son was battling severe PTSD, but that he hadn’t known what symptoms to look for. This is part of the reason that military leaders-particularly in the Army-are emphasizing family education as a tenet of suicide prevention.

“In the old days, people only used to go to the doctor because they were sick,” said Diebold. “From a medical model, we’re doing primary prevention, giving people information. When you look at heart disease, that’s telling people to eat right, get blood pressure checked, exercise, things like that. Well it’s the same thing when you’re trying to reduce the risk in people before they get to a point where they get so desperate that they are contemplating hurting themselves.”

And in the Army at least, leaders are making an effort to normalize mental health needs. All enlisted soldiers are required to watch a series of DVDs about suicide prevention and are required to carry an ACE card-a playing-card sized shortlist of instructions on how to intervene when a fellow soldier may be suicidal. Army leaders are also working to give soldiers more ways to seek help-both at home and during deployment.

“Each unit has a chaplain,” said Schofield Barracks Chaplain Maj. Victor Richardson. “When they go to the field, we go. When they eat, we eat. Where they sleep and under the conditions they sleep, we do the same. That connection is invaluable because someone may not want to come to the chapel, but if you’re walking down the street with them, or eating in the same mess hall, doing the same training, they are more apt to come to you and start talking.”

But the suicide rate continues to go up-Richardson says there’s still a strong stigma against talking to a chaplain, despite the assurance of confidentiality – and the stigma against seeking help doesn’t seem to be going away.

“We work in a macho organization,” said Tripler’s Diebold. “For the longest time, unfortunately, the direct message was that if you admit you can’t do something you’re viewed as weak. But we need to continue to send the message that we’re human and we’re in a stressful environment and it may get to the point where you need to ask for help. We want you to get the help you need so that you’re fully functioning, enjoying what you’re doing, enjoying your family, enjoying your life.”

Earlier this year, the Luceys accepted a $350,000 settlement from the Justice Department in a wrongful death lawsuit they brought against the VA. They still live every day with memories of the son they sent to war. They remember a time when Jeff was happy and the light they used to see in his eyes.

“He was your everyday kid,” said Kevin Lucey. “He was a rascal and an imp-he added many white hairs to my head. Everybody still talks about his smile. He just loved life… I guess his mother said it best: The body of our son came back from Iraq but his soul didn’t. It was the shell of Jeff but our little boy wasn’t there anymore.”

Today, Jeff’s mother wears her son’s dog tags. He had worn them until the day he died, when he left them lying on his bed. The Luceys had Jeff buried in his dress blues, that tiny, blood-stained American flag resting on his chest.

24-hour suicide hotline (press 1 for military): 1-800-273-TALK (8255)
How to help

If someone you love has displayed suicidal tendencies or expressed a desire to hurt him or herself, call 911 right away.

• Take it seriously. Suicidal behavior is a cry for help.

• Listen

• Ask: Are you thinking of killing yourself?

• Do not leave him or her alone

• Urge professional help

More resources:

The Mayo Clinic on suicide

[www.mayoclinic.com]

National Center for PTSD

[www.ncptsd.va.gov]

The VA is also in the midst of developing a 24-hour suicide computer chat-line.

Source: http://honoluluweekly.com/cover/2009/06/killed-in-action/

Navy Seeks Ferry Vessel for Pacific Operations

Brad Parsons posted this interesting information on his Hawaii Superferry blog.  It shows that the Navy is shopping for ferry vessels to charter for use in Guam and the Northern Marianas.

http://hisuperferry.blogspot.com/2009/06/latest-from-coconut-wireless-on-this.html

Monday, June 29, 2009

Latest from the Coconut Wireless on this

Forwarded:

Navy Seeks Ferry Vessel for Pacific Operations

The U.S. Navy’s Military Sealift Command (MSC) has issued a Market Survey to ask about the cost and availability of U.S. ferry vessels. Anticipated delivery will occur on October 1, although the vessel owner may propose alternate delivery dates. The location of proposed usage will be Guam, Saipan, and adjacent Pacific Ocean waters. The time charter will be for 12 months, with the possibility for three additional year-long renewals.

The closing date for responding to the Market Survey is July 14, 2009.

For more information, contact Ms. Jessica Chu of MSC at 202-685-xxxx (phone) or Jessxxx.xxx@navy.mil.

PVA has a copy of the Navy’s full document with the Market Survey. For a copy, contact Ed Welch at PVA Headquarters at 1-800-807-xxxx ext. xx or ewxxxx@passengervessel.com

Maritime Administration to repossess Hawai’i Superferry

Government to repossess Hawaii Superferry boats built at Austal

Wednesday, June 24, 2009
By KAIJA WILKINSON
Business Reporter

The U.S. Maritime Administration says that it plans to repossess and sell a pair of fast ferries built at Austal USA for Hawaii Superferry Inc.

Hawaii Superferry owes $136.8 million to the agency – commonly known as MARAD – which guaranteed the loans used to buy the ferries. It has another $22.9 million outstanding on a pair of loans from Austal.

MARAD reported this week that it plans to take possession of the ferries, now docked at Atlantic Marine in Mobile, as soon as it receives approval from bankruptcy court in Delaware. Hawaii Superferry Inc. filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in that state May 30.

The ferry vessels were purchased in 2004 for a combined price of $190 million, according to Austal, which now puts their value at about $87 million each, or $174 million together.

Austal Ltd., the Australian parent company of the Mobile shipyard, said Tuesday that it is writing off about $11 million, after taxes, for the 2008-09 fiscal year related to its ferry loans.

Talks among MARAD, Austal and Hawaii Superferry broke down last week, Austal officials said.

Maritime analysts had expected the ferry vessels to be retrofitted by Austal and chartered directly to the military. Jay Korman of The Avascent Group, a Washington, D.C., consulting firm that tracks defense programs, said Tuesday that MARAD is opting to sell the vessels rather than charter them directly, in order to recoup at least some of the costs for taxpayers.

Austal Ltd. President Bob Browning said he was disappointed that MARAD decided to seize the ferries without involving Austal in a project to prepare them for military use.

MARAD made the ferry loans under its Title XI program, which is supposed to support U.S. shipyards by reducing their reliance on military work.

Browning said that Austal approved lending $23 million to the ferry venture in part because the deal would help raise the profile of Austal’s U.S. shipyard, which at the time had been operating in Mobile for only a few years. Although it succeeded in doing that – the Mobile shipyard in November won a potential $1.6 billion contract to build up to 10 high-speed fast ferries for the military – Browning said the company’s lending days are over.

When launched in 2007, the Hawaii Superferry venture was hailed as ushering in a new era of inter-island transportation in Hawaii. The first ferry vessel was in service for about a year despite fierce environmental protests and low occupancy.

The Hawaii Supreme Court in March overturned a ruling that had allowed the ferry to function pending an environmental impact study. Hawaii Superferry Inc. ceased operations a short time later.

The company, whose primary investor is former Naval Secretary John Lehman, said subsequently that it planned to charter one or both of the ferries to a military or commercial client.

Source: http://www.al.com/news/press-register/metro.ssf?/base/news/124583492475240.xml&coll=3