Hauula woman, 57, killed in head-on collision with Marine truck

October 23, 2008

Hauula woman, 57, killed in head-on collision

Advertiser staff

A 57-year-old woman was killed today in Hau‘ula when a seven-ton Marine truck veered across the center line and into the path of her van, according to police.

The death is O‘ahu’s 38th traffic fatality of the year and sixth this month. Four of the six deaths have occurred over the last eight days.

The 2:15 p.m. head-on collision on Kamehameha Highway near the intersection of Puhuli Street involved a 2006 Chrysler van and medium tactical vehicle replacement truck from Marine Corps Base Hawaii at Kane‘ohe Bay.

The truck, driven by a 19-year-old male Marine, was northbound on Kamehameha Highway and approaching a right bend in the roadway when it veered into the southbound lane and into the path of the van, said vehicular homicide supervising investigation Sgt. Alan Vegas.

The woman, a Hau‘ula resident, was alone in the van. She was pronounced dead at the scene.

The Honolulu Medical Examiner’s office did not identify the victim pending confirmation of her identity.

Traffic in the area was affected for over five hours. Kamehameha Highway was reopened shortly before 7:30 p.m.

The truck’s driver and a 20-year-old male passenger were taken to the Tripler Medical Center in good condition, Vegas said.

Marine Corps Base Hawaii said the Marines and truck are assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment.

www.HonoluluAdvertiser.com

Chagos exiles cannot return to Diego Garcia

This from the BBC.  A terrible outcome from the House of Lords for Chagos islanders seeking to return to their island Diego Garcia.  The U.S. uses Diego Garcia as a strategic military base from which to launch attacks in the Middle East and as a secret prison for special renditions.

***

Chagos exiles ‘cannot return’

Lawyer Richard Gifford says islanders are in shock

Exiles of the Chagos Islands will not be able to return to their homeland, the House of Lords has ruled.

The government won its appeal against a previous court decision that had ruled in favour of 2,000 former residents of the British Indian Ocean territory.

They were evicted in the 1960s when the colony was leased to the US to build an airbase on the atoll of Diego Garcia.

Their solicitor Richard Gifford said they were in a “state of shock” at the “disappointing outcome”.

Mr Gifford said: “It has been the misfortune of the Chagos islanders that their passionate desire to return to their homeland has been caught up in the power politics of foreign policy for the past 40 years.”

He added that the islanders were “really shocked” at the Law Lords’ decision, following as it did the unanimous opinion of seven other judges that their right of abode was “so fundamental” the government could not take it away.

Lord Hoffmann said the case’s subtext was funding – the UK may have had to pay for rebuilding their community.

He said the Chagossians had understandably “shown no inclination to return to live Crusoe-like in poor and barren conditions of life”.

And in light of this, he said Foreign Secretary David Miliband was “entitled to take into account” the possibility the Chagossians would call on the UK to support “the economic, social and educational advancement’ of the residents”.

The campaigning journalist John Pilger said the judgment was polit ical and upheld an “immoral and illegal” act.

He added: “How could it be otherwise when the highest court in this country has found in favour of the most flagrant injustice, certainly in my lifetime?”

The Law Lords decision is the final judgement in the long-running case.

In a statement, Mr Miliband said: “It is appropriate on this day that I should repeat the government’s regret at the way the resettlement of the Chagossians was carried out in the 1960s and 1970s and at the hardship that followed for some of them.

“We do not seek to justify those actions and do not seek to excuse the conduct of an earlier generation.”

However, Mr Miliband said that the courts had previously ruled that fair compensation had been paid to the Chargossians and that “the UK has no legal obligation to pay any further compensation”.

He added: “Our appeal to the House of Lords was not about what happened in the 1960s and 1970s. It was about decisions taken in the international context of 2004.”

BBC world affairs correspondent Mike Wooldridge said the high hopes of the Chagossians would now be dashed by the ruling. He said it was likely they would take their case to the European Court of Human Rights.

In 2000, High Court judges ruled that Chagossians could return to 65 of the islands, but not to Diego Garcia.

In 2004, the government used the royal prerogative – exercised by ministers in the Queen’s name – to effectively nullify the decision.

Last year, the court overturned that order and rejected the government argument that the royal prerogative was immun e from scrutiny. The government had asked the Lords to rule on the issue.

A spokesman for the Chagos Islanders said in a statement before the three-to-two majority ruling: “Forty years ago, in December 1966, the Harold Wilson Labour government gave away our homeland, including Diego Garcia, which has been given to the US government to use as a military base.

“The whole Chagossian population was forcibly removed from our homes, our animals were killed and we were dumped, mainly in the slums of Mauritius. We have been treated like slaves.”

The exiled residents had hoped that if the Law Lords ruling had gone in their favour, their heritage could be rebuilt around a new tourist industry.

The Chagossians will require immigration consent to visit the islands for purposes such as tending graves, but the government has made it clear that consent would be no more than a formality.
EXILE’S BATTLE TO RETURN
1967 – 1971: Chagossians evicted from Indian Ocean homeland
2000: High Court rules they can return to 65 islands, but not Diego Garcia
2004: Government uses royal prerogative to nullify decision
2007: Court overturns that order
June 2008: Government asks the Lords to rule on the issue
October 2008: Government wins appeal against the return

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/7683726.stm

Published: 2008/10/22 13:40:06 GMT

Big win for war resisters – Lt. Watada can’t be retried

HonoluluAdvertiser.com

October 22, 2008

Army can’t retry Watada for refusal to serve in Iraq war

Judge blocks Army from retrying war objector on three main allegations

Advertiser Staff and News Services

SEATTLE – A federal judge ruled late yesterday that the Army cannot retry 1st Lt. Ehren Watada, the Kalani High graduate who was the first commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the war in Iraq, on the main charges against him.

Watada was charged with missing his Fort Lewis, Wash., Stryker brigade’s deployment and with conduct unbecoming an officer after he refused to board a flight to the Middle East in June 2006.

The 30-year-old soldier contended that the war is illegal and that he would be a party to war crimes if he served in Iraq. His first court-martial ended in a mistrial in February 2007.

Watada’s father, Bob, last night said, “It’s obviously good news. It’s very good news.”

Bob Watada added that “we kind of expected this” because U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle of Tacoma ruled in November 2007 that a second trial would violate Ehren’s constitutional rights involving double jeopardy, or being tried twice for the same crime.

Settle at the time put in place a preliminary injunction temporarily halting a new court-martial.

Settle yesterday ruled that the government could not retry Watada on three of the charges because doing so would violate Watada’s double jeopardy rights.

Settle barred the military from retrying Watada on charges of missing his deployment to Iraq, taking part in a news conference and participating in a Veterans for Peace national convention.

But the court did not rule out the possibility that the Army, after considering legal issues, could retry Watada on two counts of conduct unbecoming an officer resulting from his media interviews.

“He dismissed the heart of their case,” Watada lawyer Jim Lobsenz said. “We’re very pleased. It’s taken a long time.”

Honolulu attorney Eric Seitz, who previously represented Watada and was the first to raise the double jeopardy issue, said those two charges were dismissed in the first court-martial and that the Army believes that they “theoretically, hypothetically can be brought back, but I think there’s going to be lots of problems.”

“I don’t think they can bring those back, either,” Seitz said.

In a statement late yesterday, a Fort Lewis spokesman said the base’s commanding general, Lt. Gen. Charles H. Jacoby Jr., had not yet had a chance to review the ruling in depth.

“Once that review is complete, he will be able to make a decision on the way forward with this case,” the spokesman said.

The 1996 Kalani High graduate, stripped of his security clearance, still reports to a meaningless desk job at Fort Lewis, according to family. “He said he’s counting paper clips,” his father, Bob Watada, said in an interview last week.

“We talk every once in awhile. He lets me know that he’s OK,” said the father, who lives in Oregon. Bob Watada said his son’s term of service in the Army ended in December 2006, but that the legal proceedings have prevented his discharge.

Bob Watada, a former Hawai’i Campaign Spending Commission executive director, said that even if the charges are dismissed, he’s worried the Army might appeal the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“The Defense Department has a lot of money (to pursue legal action),” Bob Watada said.

Many military members opined that Watada violated his oath as an officer, and that he had no right to decide whether the Iraq War was just or unjust.

Kaneohe Marine accused of burglary, auto theft

HonoluluAdvertiser.com

October 22, 2008

Kaneohe Marine accused of burglary, auto theft

Advertiser Staff

A 19-year-old Marine based at Kane‘ohe was charged yesterday with multiple offenses stemming from an alleged burglary early Sunday in Kaka‘ako.

Joseph Striegel was charged with second-degree burglary, first-degree criminal property damage, auto theft, leaving the scene of an accident, operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant and resisting arrest. His bail totals $20,000.

Striegel was arrested at 4:27 a.m. at Pensacola and Waimanu streets.

According to police, Striegel allegedly climbed to the rooftop and entered a business through an unlocked door. Striegel allegedly took a vehicle and drove it through the bay doors, striking another vehicle parked outside. He jumped from the moving vehicle and fled the scene.

Army Sgt. accused of stabbing man in Wahiawa

KITV.com

Soldier Appears In Court Over Wahiawa Stabbing

Attack Leaves Victim In Critical Condition

POSTED: 2:20 pm HST October 22, 2008
UPDATED: 2:54 pm HST October 22, 2008

HONOLULU — An Army sergeant accused of stabbing an 18-year-old man multiple times in Wahiawa made his first appearance over the case in court Wednesday morning.

Sgt. Tahoma James Ramage, 30, is a charged with second-degree attempted murder.

The Schofield Barracks-based soldier is being held on $30,000 bail.

The attacked happened just after midnight Monday at the intersection of Kamehameha Highway and Olive Avenue, police said.

The victim was last reported to be in critical condition.

Source: http://www.kitv.com/print/17783326/detail.html

Soldier accused of stabbing Wahiawa man

Soldier Appears In Court Over Wahiawa Stabbing

Attack Leaves Victim In Critical Condition

POSTED: 2:20 pm HST October 22, 2008

HONOLULU — An Army sergeant accused of stabbing an 18-year-old man multiple times in Wahiawa made his first appearance over the case in court Wednesday morning.

Sgt. Tahoma James Ramage, 30, is a charged with second-degree attempted murder.

The Schofield Barracks-based soldier is being held on $30,000 bail.

The attacked happened just after midnight Monday at the intersection of Kamehameha Highway and Olive Avenue, police said.

The victim was last reported to be in critical condition.

Source: KITV.com

Don’t choke – here comes more Stryker pork

October 20, 2008

Stryker project will create jobs in Hawaii

1,000 or more will be employed, officials say, for massive project

By William Cole
Advertiser Military Writer

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS – The massive Stryker brigade project, one of the biggest Army efforts in
Hawai’i since World War II, is getting back on track after four years of litigation.

Approximately six construction projects related to the Stryker brigade are expected to begin in coming months, employing 1,000 or more workers, officials said.

“The timing is really good,” said Paul Brewbaker, chief economist for the Bank of Hawai’i, who noted the Stryker projects come as the state’s economy is slowing.

The number of construction jobs in Hawai’i, which stood at about 39,600 in August, is projected to drop to about 37,000 in 2010. Even that outlook may be too optimistic, and Brewbaker said the Stryker work, which wasn’t included in the job total, is a welcome addition to a struggling economy.

“A project that’s worth an extra 1,000 jobs for a year, or two or three, is a significant offset to what may be the risk that’s unfolded,” he said.

$1.5 billion effort

The Stryker is an eight-wheeled troop carrier. The Schofield-based Stryker brigade, which consists of 328 Stryker vehicles and 4,000 soldiers, is deployed in Iraq and is expected back in Hawai’i around March.

As part of the overall $1.5 billion effort to base the brigade here, the Army plans to build 71 miles of private trails on O’ahu and the Big Island for Stryker vehicles, as well as new firing ranges.

Land purchases included $21 million for 1,402 acres south of Schofield for a firing range and motor pool, and $30 million for 24,000 acres of Parker Ranch land next to the 109,000-acre Pohakuloa Training Area for Stryker maneuvers on the Big Island.

The Army plans to also conduct Stryker training at Kahuku and Kawailoa training areas and Dillingham Military Reservation on O’ahu.

Additional projects, some still unfunded by Congress, are expected to continue as far into the future as 2017, officials said.

Among the projects coming up is construction of a Battle Area Complex in the back reaches of Schofield for Stryker vehicle maneuver and live fire.

MASSIVE RANGE

The nearly 1-by-2-mile range will have roads and pop-up targets for Strykers firing big 105 mm guns as well as .50-caliber machine guns and Mk 19 grenade launchers.

Soldiers in as many as 30 Strykers will maneuver and disperse from the back of the 19-ton troop
carriers and also practice firing at targets.

The $32 million contract for the job, held by Parsons Inc., is expected to employ 50 to 60 people on the site at any given time for up to the two years the project is expected to take, officials said.

The Army Corps of Engineers, which manages the Stryker brigade projects, said it and Parsons are still in the process of negotiating an “equitable adjustment” for the work stoppage caused by the past court injunction.

The Schofield Stryker brigade has been gone since late 2007, when the unit deployed to the Taji and Tarmiya areas of Iraq, just north of Baghdad.

In April, the Army decided Hawai’i was still the best place to station one of its seven Stryker brigades after legal action forced a review of the stationing.

“Hawai’i is the right place for the 2/25 Stryker brigade – strategically, economically and environmentally,” said Col. Wayne Shanks, a spokesman for U.S. Army Pacific at Fort Shafter.

“Completing these projects, which will allow our soldiers to train here in Hawai’i, is vital to our ability to meet our national security requirements in the Pacific.”

HAWAIIAN GROUPS SUED

The Army in 2001 decided to base a Stryker unit in Hawai’i, and started about $700 million in
construction projects, including upgrades that were also needed for non-Stryker troop training.
Three Native Hawaiian groups filed a lawsuit in 2004 against the Stryker brigade, claiming it would harm the environment.

In 2006, a federal appeals court ruled that the service had not adequately examined alternative
locations outside Hawai’i for the unit, and ordered the Army to do so.

Bases in Alaska and Colorado were considered before the Army again chose Hawai’i, saying it was
selected primarily because of the ability to meet strategic defense and national security needs in the Pacific.

Some of the Stryker construction projects already had been completed, but some others, like the Battle Area Complex at Schofield, weren’t allowed to go forward.

LOCAL IMPACT CITED

David Henkin, an Earthjustice attorney who represented the three Hawaiian groups in their lawsuit, said an additional infantry brigade of about 3,500 soldiers, which Schofield would have received if the Stryker unit had been moved elsewhere, would have had less of an impact in Hawai’i.

“No question, even based upon the Army’s own analysis, that the potential destruction of critical sites, the likely destruction of endangered species, the noise, the impacts on neighboring communities, all of that is substantially greater with the Stryker brigade than an infantry brigade,” Henkin said.

The state Office of Hawaiian Affairs filed a separate lawsuit against the Army in 2006 over the cultural impacts of the Stryker brigade at Schofield. That suit still is pending. Shanks, the U.S. Army Pacific spokesman, said the parties are in negotiation over the suit.

Qualification Training Range 2 at Schofield, a rifle and pistol marksmanship range, was about 80 percent complete when the injunction halted the project, said Ron Borne, the director of transformation for the Army in Hawai’i.

Workers for the Niking Corp., one of the subcontractors at the range, are now finishing the job. Carpenter Dave Cavanaugh, who has worked for Niking for almost 25 years, last week said the work stoppage didn’t affect him much.

“We do a lot of military work, so when this job shut down, fortunately, we were able to go to another project that our company had already started,” he said. “It was an inconvenience, but we’re glad to be back and completing the job.”

Source: HonoluluAdvertiser.com

Ex-soldier, convicted murderer, on trial for another rape-murder

From: HonoluluAdvertiser.com

Posted on: Friday, October 17, 2008

Suspect in 1999 Hawaii murder tagged as threat in ’96 memo

Specialist had sought ‘intensive supervision’ for convicted murderer

By Jim Dooley
Advertiser Staff Writer

Darnell Griffin, now awaiting trial for the 1999 rape and murder of Evelyn Luka, was identified three years before the crime as a dangerous sexual predator whose movements after leaving prison should be restricted by parole authorities, according to court records.

The warning, issued in January 1996 by state sex-offender specialist Barry Coyne, virtually predicted the way in which prosecutors now say Griffin met and attacked Luka on Sept. 6, 1999.

Griffin had been convicted in 1980 of murdering another woman. Before Griffin was paroled on March 5, 1996, Coyne recommended that he be subjected to “more intense supervision” than normal, including a 9 p.m. curfew and a warning that if he visited nightclubs in central Honolulu or Waikiki, his parole could be revoked.

Coyne also recommended that Griffin be required to regularly take and pass polygraph tests to make sure he was not violating the terms of his release from prison.

According to records filed in the Luka case, the victim was last seen leaving Venus Nite Club on Kapi’olani Boulevard around midnight with a man matching Griffin’s description in a vehicle matching the one that Griffin drove at the time.

Luka, 20, was found barely alive early the next morning on the side of H-2 Freeway. Sexually assaulted and strangled, she died the following month of brain injuries when her family removed her from life support.

Coyne would not comment last week on his memo.

Hawai’i Paroling Authority administrator Max Otani said that, despite Coyne’s concerns about Griffin, the parolee remained under “intensive supervision” only through December 1996.

That program imposed a 9 p.m. curfew and Griffin was subjected once to a polygraph examination, in November 1996, Otani said.

As of 1997, Griffin was transferred to general parole status, which included an 11 p.m. curfew and instructions not to consume alcohol or visit premises where alcohol is served, Otani said.

There is no indication in court files that parole officials or Honolulu police detectives identified Griffin as a possible suspect in the Luka murder until a DNA sample he provided in 2006 was later matched with evidence collected in 1999.

Griffin was required to supply the DNA under a 2005 state law requiring collection of such samples from all convicted murderers.
guilty in 1980 killing

Griffin was convicted in 1980 of murdering Lynn Gheradi, a 28-year-old X-ray technician who was found strangled to death in her Makiki apartment.

Friends told police that Gheradi had met Griffin, then an Army soldier, at a disco and that he had become obsessed with her. After she rejected his advances, he became angry, her friends testified at Griffin’s trial.

Police found a rattan chair belonging to Gheradi in Griffin’s apartment.

Court records show that authorities believed Griffin had sexually assaulted Gheradi before he killed her, but they lacked evidence to support that belief, and he was charged and convicted of one count of second-degree murder.

He was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole, and served 16 years before he was granted parole in March 1996.

Before the parole, Coyne wrote his warning memo to then-Hawai’i Paroling Authority chairman Claudio Suyat.

“Mr. Griffin was called to my attention as a potential sex offender by parole officer Edwin Uyehara,” Coyne wrote.

“I share Mr. Uyehara’s concern,” Coyne wrote.

“Mr. Griffin was convicted of murder, based upon his prior stalking the victim and her belongings found in his possession,” the memo continued.

“Although evidence was clear that the victim had engaged in sexual intercourse the day she was murdered, no direct sexual evidence (his semen or pubic hair) could establish that Mr. Griffin raped the victim before killing her,” Coyne wrote.

“Six months prior to his arrest for murder, Mr. Griffin raped a tourist, but the prosecutor declined to prosecute. Mr. Griffin had that case expunged from official records. However, his modus operandi in the rape case duplicates his behavior in the murder: He meets an attractive woman in a Waikiki nightclub. He stalks her to her home or hotel room. He gains entry. He rapes her,” Coyne wrote.

He noted that his office could not require or recommend Griffin for sex offender treatment because he had no record as a sex offender and denied being a rapist.

“Given everyone’s shared concerns, I would like to recommend that HPA impose more intense supervision on Mr. Griffin than might be normal in such cases,” Coyne wrote.

“Because he meets female tourists in nightclubs, I recommend that he not be allowed access to Waikiki, Kaka’ako, Ke’eaumoku, Downtown or other areas where nightclubs operate,” Coyne said.

“A 9 p.m. curfew should further limit his access to new victims. And polygraphs will help maintain and verify his compliance to the parole contact,” the memo concluded.

no red flags raised

Griffin was required to participate in a sex-offender treatment program when he was first paroled, but that requirement was ended in November 1996 “because he was not a convicted sex offender,” Otani said.

On Sept. 9, 1999, three days after Luka was attacked, police asked for the public’s help in finding the man last seen with her at the Venus Nite Club. The physical description of the man generally matched Griffin as well as the fact that the man was driving a “late-model green Nissan Pathfinder.” A police sketch of the man was also issued.

Parole authorities knew that Griffin was driving a 1996 Pathfinder because he reported leasing the vehicle to them in December 1996, records show.

That information, coupled with Coyne’s earlier warning about Griffin, still did not raise any flags at the Paroling Authority, Otani acknowledged.

“There’s nothing in the file to indicate that,” he said.

Griffin and his wife were married in 1997 and have two children. He has helped raise a third child born to his wife from a previous relationship.

Griffin, 50, came to Hawai’i as a soldier in 1978 and was honorably discharged from the service in 1982.

According to his parole files, he is a highly trained computer technician and engineer, with two bachelor’s degrees. He has worked as an information systems specialist at Tripler Army Medical Center and for private companies.

At the time of the Luka assault, Griffin was working for a private company providing computer services at Wheeler Army Air Field, according to court files.

trial starts in april

Griffin has pleaded not guilty to the rape and murder charges, and has been in custody since his arrest in April 2007, unable to post $5 million bail.

In April of this year, Griffin’s lawyer, Deputy Public Defender E. Edward Aquino, told prosecutor Kevin Takata that Griffin “will admit to having sex with victim Evelyn Luka, but will deny that he murdered her and will claim that he was not present when Evelyn Luka was killed.”

Trial in the case is set to begin April 13, 2009.

Besides the DNA evidence, prosecutor Takata has said he intends to introduce other incriminating evidence collected against Griffin.

Luka’s husband, Kevin, told police that she called him from Venus Nite Club the evening she was attacked, saying she was catching a ride home with a friend who lived in the Salt Lake area. That’s where Griffin was living with his wife and children in 1999.

Witnesses at the nightclub said they saw her leave with a man driving a green Nissan Pathfinder SUV with a military base decal on the windshield. Griffin was leasing a 1996 Pathfinder with just that sort of decal on the windshield in 1999.

Takata also said he plans to introduce the rape complaint filed against Griffin in October 1979 by a 26-year-old tourist who said that she met and danced with Griffin at the Spats discotheque in Waikiki.

The woman told police that she and Griffin left the nightclub separately that evening, but he appeared at her hotel room the following day, threatened to kill her and raped her. Prosecutors would not pursue the case, citing discrepancies in the victim’s statement.

The incident occurred a year before Griffin murdered Gheradi, whom he also met at Spats.

Takata also intends to use a statement from a 26-year-old woman who told police she encountered Griffin on Dec. 6, 2006, in a Waipahu parking lot. The defendant was allegedly masturbating in his car and offered the woman marijuana and methamphetamines if she agreed to have sex with him. She declined the offer but wrote down the telephone number the man gave her. It allegedly matched Griffin’s cell phone.

Reach Jim Dooley at jdooley@honoluluadvertiser.com.

DARNELL GRIFFIN TIMELINE

Oct. 23, 1978: Army transfers Darnell Griffin to Hawai’i.

Oct. 17, 1979: He’s accused of rape by 26-year-old female tourist; case dismissed.

Oct. 11, 1980: Murders Lynn Gheradi.

Feb. 14, 1983: Sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole for murdering Gheradi.

Jan. 12, 1996: State official Barry Coyne writes warning memo, advises close supervision of Griffin as parolee.

March 5, 1996: Griffin paroled under “intensive supervision.”

Dec. 30, 1996: Intensive supervision of Griffin lifted by Hawai’i Paroling Authority.

Sept. 6, 1999: Evelyn Luka raped and strangled.

Sept. 6, 2004: DNA evidence from Luka case entered in national database.

Nov. 24, 2006: DNA sample obtained from Griffin by parole officer.

Dec. 9, 2006: Griffin allegedly exposes himself, solicits sex from 26-year-old woman.

Feb. 26, 2007: Griffin DNA sample matched to DNA from Luka case.

March 28, 2007: Griffin arrested and charged with rape and murder of Evelyn Luka.

Ex-Marine accused of raping a 10-year old girl

Ex-Marine charged with assaulting girl

By Nelson Daranciang

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Sep 24, 2008

A man kicked out of the Marine Corps is accused of raping a 10-year-old girl after assaulting the girl’s father in a Waikiki hotel last week, said Vickie Kapp, deputy city prosecutor.

An Oahu grand jury returned an indictment yesterday charging Christopher Cantrell, 27, on five counts of sexual assault in the first degree, one count of sexual assault in the third degree, promoting child abuse, kidnapping, burglary and assault.

The first-degree child-abuse charge alleges that Cantrell produced or participated in the preparation of child pornography.

Police said Cantrell committed the crimes about 3 a.m. Wednesday at the Waikiki Banyan condominium-hotel.

Kapp said Cantrell “kidnapped and sexually assaulted the 10-year-old daughter of a man who had befriended him.”

Cantrell was in the victims’ 12th-floor hotel room where, the girl told police, he punched her father in the face until her father fell to the ground unconscious. She said Cantrell then forced her into the 10th-floor laundry room, where he sexually assaulted her.

Two security guards detained him until police arrived.

Kapp said Cantrell was dishonorably discharged from the Marine Corps in 2005 and had spent three years in confinement. Information regarding the crime or crimes for which he was court-martialed were not available.

He remains in custody unable to post $200,000 bail.

Source: http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20080924_Ex-Marine_charged_with_assaulting_girl.html

Ex-Marine Allegedly Raped Child At Waikiki Hotel

KITV.com

S.C. Man Accused Of Raping Child At Waikiki Hotel

Court Documents Say Man Beat Victim’s Father Unconscious

POSTED: 9:43 pm HST September 19, 2008
UPDATED: 11:56 am HST September 23, 2008

HONOLULU — A 27-year-old South Carolina man accused of raping a 10-year-old girl at a Waikiki hotel appeared in court on Friday.

The father of the victim befriended Christopher Cantrell.

Cantrell and the victim’s father were with his 10-year-old daughter at the pool deck of the Waikiki Banyan Hotel late Tuesday night, according to court documents.

Then Cantrell accompanied the man and his daughter up to their hotel room. It was there Cantrell asked to take nude photos of Martindale’s daughter, court document said. That is when Martindale said Cantrell physically assaulted him.

The child told police Cantrell repeatedly punched her father knocking him unconscious. Cantrell took the child to the laundry room where he sexually assaulted her, according to the documents.

Shortly after that Cantrell and the child returned to the pool deck. Hotel security became suspicious and apprehended Cantrell until police officers arrived.

Documents disclosed the child later identified Cantrell to officials as the man who raped her.

Kapiolani Medical Center’s Sex Abuse Treatment Center’s Executive Director Adriana Ramelli said parents need to talk to their children about inappropriate touching.

“(They) need to be able to tell their child ‘If this happens to you, tell me right away. You are not to blame,'” Ramelli said.

She said in the recent case the child victim showed a lot of courage by telling police about the
assault.

Cantrell is being held on $200,000 bail. His next court date is set for Tuesday.

Source: http://www.kitv.com/print/17519045/detail.html